Search for: "Smith v. Phillips" Results 21 - 40 of 232
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2019, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Smith — Again” [Joseph Davis, Becket/Federalist Society on certiorari petition in Ricks v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In [*2]addition, a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct, in itself, does not give rise to a private cause of action against an attorney or law firm (see Cohen v Kachroo, 115 AD3d 512, 513; DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 814; Kallman v Krupnick, 67 AD3d 1093, 1096; Weintraub v Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim, & Ballon, 172 AD2d 254, 254). [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See e.g., Leff v Fulbright & aworski, L.L.P., 78 AD3d 531, 533 [1st Dept 2010], lv denied 17 NY3d 705 [2011] [damages in malpractice case “grossly speculative” where plaintiff could not establish what would have occurred but for defendants’ conduct]; Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Grp. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  This event is closed to the public.Student Presenters:Jonathon Booth, Harvard University (jonathonbooth@g.harvard.edu) The Birth of Policing in Post-Emancipation JamaicaLauren Feldman, Johns Hopkins University (lauren.feldman@jhu.edu) Constructing Legal Matrimony and the State in New York and the United States: Debating New York's Marriage Act of 1827 and its EffectsJamie Grischkan, Boston University (jgrisch@bu.edu) Banking, Law, and American Liberalism: The Rise and… [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
McConnell’s Campaign Locked Out by Twitter for Posting Critic’s Profanity-Laced Video Louisville Courier-Journal – Ben Tobin and Phillip Bailey | Published: 8/7/2019 After sharing a video of a profanity-laced protest, U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The allegation that plaintiff would have stopped speculating on the stock at a time when its shares were selling for an amount greater than his actual investment thus depends on “a chain of gross speculations on future events” (Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999] [internal quotation marks omitted], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 4:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
”‘ (Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II, LP., v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimp, LLP, 265 AD2d at 210.) [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 3:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The allegation that plaintiff would have stopped speculating on the stock at a time when its shares were selling for an amount greater than his actual investment thus depends on “a chain of gross speculations on future events” (Phillips-Smith Speciality Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999] [internal quotation marks omitted], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 7:17 am by Andrew Hamm
Subscript Law has a graphic explainer for Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. [read post]