Search for: "Smith v. Phillips"
Results 61 - 80
of 354
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2020, 4:11 pm
Zhao v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
” (Mooppan referred to Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 6:43 am
Here’s a round-up of other Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Biden’s Top SCOTUS Lawyer Should Be Woman, Court Watchers Say (Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson & Jess Bravin, Bloomberg Law) Supreme Court Rejects Texas Inmates’ Plea for Stronger Health Measures (Jess Bravin, The Wall Street Journal) Smith Has Got to Go (James Phillips, National Review) Supreme Court Declines Appeal Backed by Illinois School Districts on Tax Remedies (Mark… [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 8:18 pm
[He talked about COVID and Religious Liberty, the Second Amendment, Free Speech, and "Bullying" of the Supreme Court by U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, which rested on "religious hostility on the part of the State itself," and specifically on "the Commission's consideration of Phillips' case," which the Court held "was neither tolerant nor respectful of Phillips' religious beliefs. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
" Mooppan cited Pena–Rodriguez v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am
See, e.g., Smith v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 3:44 pm
Smith for their insightful critiques of my book, Gay Rights v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:21 am
See Smith, 494 U. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
Sineneng-Smith, which the court decided in May. [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:29 am
Phillips (N.Y. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 3:00 am
In the non-precedential case of Phillips v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 3:01 am
Smith — Again” [Joseph Davis, Becket/Federalist Society on certiorari petition in Ricks v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
In [*2]addition, a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct, in itself, does not give rise to a private cause of action against an attorney or law firm (see Cohen v Kachroo, 115 AD3d 512, 513; DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 814; Kallman v Krupnick, 67 AD3d 1093, 1096; Weintraub v Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim, & Ballon, 172 AD2d 254, 254). [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:13 pm
White and Oncale v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
(See e.g., Leff v Fulbright & aworski, L.L.P., 78 AD3d 531, 533 [1st Dept 2010], lv denied 17 NY3d 705 [2011] [damages in malpractice case “grossly speculative” where plaintiff could not establish what would have occurred but for defendants’ conduct]; Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Grp. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
This event is closed to the public.Student Presenters:Jonathon Booth, Harvard University (jonathonbooth@g.harvard.edu) The Birth of Policing in Post-Emancipation JamaicaLauren Feldman, Johns Hopkins University (lauren.feldman@jhu.edu) Constructing Legal Matrimony and the State in New York and the United States: Debating New York's Marriage Act of 1827 and its EffectsJamie Grischkan, Boston University (jgrisch@bu.edu) Banking, Law, and American Liberalism: The Rise and… [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
McConnell’s Campaign Locked Out by Twitter for Posting Critic’s Profanity-Laced Video Louisville Courier-Journal – Ben Tobin and Phillip Bailey | Published: 8/7/2019 After sharing a video of a profanity-laced protest, U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 4:06 am
The allegation that plaintiff would have stopped speculating on the stock at a time when its shares were selling for an amount greater than his actual investment thus depends on “a chain of gross speculations on future events” (Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999] [internal quotation marks omitted], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
