Search for: "Smith v. Robinson" Results 61 - 80 of 281
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
On 18 July 2018 the Court of Appeal heard the appeal of former EDL leader Tommy Robinson against his 13 month prison sentence for contempt of court. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
At The Daily Wire, Jessica Prol Smith refutes comparisons between the restaurant owner who asked the president’s press secretary to leave her restaurant and the florist in Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 3:25 am by Peter Mahler
See Tzolis v Wolff, 10 NY3d 100, 108 (2008) (quoting Robinson v Smith, 3 Paige Ch. 222, 232–33 (NY Ch. 1832)). [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit, and Smith v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 6:08 am
Robinson, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Thursday, April 5, 2018 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Deal protection, Insurance, Market efficiency, Mergers & acquisitions, Risk management, Underwriting [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Encino Motorcars v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin discuss the case in an episode of Bloomberg BNA’s Cases and Controversies podcast. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Robert Kreisman
On remand, the appellate court directed the trial court to reconsider the issue using the standard adopted from the case of Smith v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 7:20 am by Jim Harper
But the “third-party doctrine” as found in Smith v. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Robinson has written a column for the South Carolina Press Association about ‘legal responses to attacks against the media. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg BNA, Kimberly Robinson reports on Pavan v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:00 pm by David Kravets
This third-party doctrine dates to a 1979 Supreme Court case called Smith v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At CNN, Joan Biskupic observes that Beckles v. [read post]