Search for: "Smith v. Robinson" Results 61 - 80 of 277
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin discuss the case in an episode of Bloomberg BNA’s Cases and Controversies podcast. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Robert Kreisman
On remand, the appellate court directed the trial court to reconsider the issue using the standard adopted from the case of Smith v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 6:40 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Shelbert Smith, No. 116,968 (Sedgwick)Denial of late appealRichard Ney[Reversed and remanded; Nuss; August 17, 2018]Improper consideration of factors related to defendant's credibilityState v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 7:20 am by Jim Harper
But the “third-party doctrine” as found in Smith v. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Robinson has written a column for the South Carolina Press Association about ‘legal responses to attacks against the media. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg BNA, Kimberly Robinson reports on Pavan v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:00 pm by David Kravets
This third-party doctrine dates to a 1979 Supreme Court case called Smith v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At CNN, Joan Biskupic observes that Beckles v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 10:00 pm
On July 22, 2016, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals released its opinion in Smith v Brett/Robinson Construction Company, Inc. and again found that evidence which only establishes a mere possibility that the injuries are related to the work accident is not sufficient to prove medical causation. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
First Minister Peter Robinson is to receive libel damages from Private Eye magazine over allegations linking him to a blocked nomination for a peerage. [read post]