Search for: "Smith v. Robinson"
Results 61 - 80
of 282
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
In Smith v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm
On 18 July 2018 the Court of Appeal heard the appeal of former EDL leader Tommy Robinson against his 13 month prison sentence for contempt of court. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am
At The Daily Wire, Jessica Prol Smith refutes comparisons between the restaurant owner who asked the president’s press secretary to leave her restaurant and the florist in Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 3:25 am
See Tzolis v Wolff, 10 NY3d 100, 108 (2008) (quoting Robinson v Smith, 3 Paige Ch. 222, 232–33 (NY Ch. 1832)). [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm
Robinson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:38 pm
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit, and Smith v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 6:08 am
Robinson, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Thursday, April 5, 2018 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Deal protection, Insurance, Market efficiency, Mergers & acquisitions, Risk management, Underwriting [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:36 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Encino Motorcars v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:12 am
Schwartz, of Gray Robinson. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am
” Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin discuss the case in an episode of Bloomberg BNA’s Cases and Controversies podcast. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
On remand, the appellate court directed the trial court to reconsider the issue using the standard adopted from the case of Smith v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 6:40 pm
Shelbert Smith, No. 116,968 (Sedgwick)Denial of late appealRichard Ney[Reversed and remanded; Nuss; August 17, 2018]Improper consideration of factors related to defendant's credibilityState v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 1:55 pm
Smith). [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 7:20 am
But the “third-party doctrine” as found in Smith v. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm
Robinson has written a column for the South Carolina Press Association about ‘legal responses to attacks against the media. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:10 am
” At Bloomberg BNA, Kimberly Robinson reports on Pavan v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:00 pm
This third-party doctrine dates to a 1979 Supreme Court case called Smith v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 4:18 am
At CNN, Joan Biskupic observes that Beckles v. [read post]
