Search for: "Smith v. SMITH" Results 161 - 180 of 15,996
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2021, 6:00 am
curid=40859850 Jane LambertIntellectual Property Enterprise Court (Recorder Amanda Michaels) Alyssa Smith Jewellery Ltd v Alisa Goodstone t/a Alyssa Jewellery Design [2021] EWHC 1482 (IPEC) (9 June 2021 [read post]
30 May 2008, 1:33 am
Regina (Smith) v Assistant Deputy Coroner for Oxfordshire; Secretary of State for Defence v Same Queen’s Bench Division “The right to life, protected by article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, could extend to members of the Armed Forces, wherever they might be; whether it did so would depend on the circumstances of the particular case. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:08 pm by Troy McKenzie
Marshall, better known as "The Anna Nicole Smith Case II. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 10:26 am by Paul Caron
Smith (Ivins, Phillips & Barker, Washington, D.C.), Changes in Agencies’ Interpretations of Their Own Regulations and Auer Deference: Perez v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 7:33 am
Jessica Smith, a member of the faculty at the School of Government of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, has given me permission to post on the blog links to her monograph, Crawford v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 12:48 pm by Thomas Berg
(Posted one day late) Employment Division v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 12:12 pm
Smith, an important Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause property rights case that was heard by the Supreme Court today: Today, the Supreme Court hears Alvarez v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:15 am by Lawrence Solum
Smith (University of Idaho College of Law) has posted Idaho's Law of Constitutional Interpretation: Lessons from Planned Parenthood Great Northwest v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:20 am by sally
Regina (Boyejo and Others) v Barnet London Borough Council; Regina (Smith) v Portsmouth City Council Queen’s Bench Division “References in documentation before decision-makers to disabilities or to rights of equality, was not sufficient to fulfil the statutory requirement of such recognition. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:36 pm by Lawrence Solum
In considering the South African case of Laugh It Off Promotions CC v. [read post]