Search for: "Smith v. Smith" Results 281 - 300 of 16,260
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2024, 1:07 pm by Ilya Somin
Smith, which was authored by conservative Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
Below is my column in the Hill on the Supreme Court decision on Friday in Fischer v. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 5:10 am by Just Security
McCord and Andrew Weissmann (@AWeissmann_) Foreign Affairs Deference After Chevron by Kristen Eichensehr (@K_Eichensehr) Unpacking the Supreme Court’s Punt on Alleged Government ‘Coercion’ of Social Media Companies: What Murthy v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:56 pm by Mark Walsh
United States on behalf of Special Counsel Jack Smith and the Justice Department. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 4:40 am by Brittany Bromell
Last Friday, the United States Supreme Court decided Smith v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 10:11 pm by Josh Blackman
It reminded me of the scene from the Matrix Reloaded where Neo single-handedly destroys every single Agent Smith. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by Matthew Chagares
The majority applied the Court’s recent New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 2:17 pm by Mark Walsh
On May 16, there was Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s cryptically short bench announcement in Smith v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 11:52 am
              In a prior post, I have analyzed the justices’ treatment of the questions presented in the petition in Smith v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 3:12 am by Dylan Gibbs
" - Brian Lilley | Edmonton… x.com/i/web/status/1… — Danielle Smith (@ABDanielleSmith) Jun 24, 2024 That’s all for today. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 3:12 am by Dylan Gibbs
" - Brian Lilley | Edmonton… x.com/i/web/status/1… — Danielle Smith (@ABDanielleSmith) 5:42 PM • Jun 24, 2024 That’s all for today. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In determining what constitutes . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement, we must look to the substance of the transaction and not to what the parties may label it" (Matter of Green v Regan, 103 AD2d 878, 878-879 [3d Dept 1984]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1210; Matter of Chichester v DiNapoli, 108 AD3d 924, 925 [3d Dept 2013]). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In determining what constitutes . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement, we must look to the substance of the transaction and not to what the parties may label it" (Matter of Green v Regan, 103 AD2d 878, 878-879 [3d Dept 1984]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1210; Matter of Chichester v DiNapoli, 108 AD3d 924, 925 [3d Dept 2013]). [read post]