Search for: "Smith v. Smith"
Results 281 - 300
of 16,260
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Fischer v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 1:07 pm
Smith, which was authored by conservative Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
Below is my column in the Hill on the Supreme Court decision on Friday in Fischer v. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 9:02 am
See Smith v. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 5:10 am
McCord and Andrew Weissmann (@AWeissmann_) Foreign Affairs Deference After Chevron by Kristen Eichensehr (@K_Eichensehr) Unpacking the Supreme Court’s Punt on Alleged Government ‘Coercion’ of Social Media Companies: What Murthy v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:56 pm
United States on behalf of Special Counsel Jack Smith and the Justice Department. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 8:40 am
What does the Supreme Court’s decision in Fischer v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 4:40 am
Last Friday, the United States Supreme Court decided Smith v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 10:11 pm
It reminded me of the scene from the Matrix Reloaded where Neo single-handedly destroys every single Agent Smith. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
The majority applied the Court’s recent New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 2:17 pm
On May 16, there was Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s cryptically short bench announcement in Smith v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 11:52 am
In a prior post, I have analyzed the justices’ treatment of the questions presented in the petition in Smith v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
This post summarizes Smith v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 3:12 am
" - Brian Lilley | Edmonton… x.com/i/web/status/1… — Danielle Smith (@ABDanielleSmith) Jun 24, 2024 That’s all for today. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 3:12 am
" - Brian Lilley | Edmonton… x.com/i/web/status/1… — Danielle Smith (@ABDanielleSmith) 5:42 PM • Jun 24, 2024 That’s all for today. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 12:25 pm
The case in question, Smith v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"In determining what constitutes . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement, we must look to the substance of the transaction and not to what the parties may label it" (Matter of Green v Regan, 103 AD2d 878, 878-879 [3d Dept 1984]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1210; Matter of Chichester v DiNapoli, 108 AD3d 924, 925 [3d Dept 2013]). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"In determining what constitutes . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement, we must look to the substance of the transaction and not to what the parties may label it" (Matter of Green v Regan, 103 AD2d 878, 878-879 [3d Dept 1984]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1210; Matter of Chichester v DiNapoli, 108 AD3d 924, 925 [3d Dept 2013]). [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 3:07 pm
The Supreme Court decided Smith v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:59 pm
The first case, Braidwood Management v. [read post]