Search for: "Smith v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner"
Results 1 - 20
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2019, 7:30 am
The Social Security Administration, however, has no record of receiving his appeal before September 21, 2014, when it received a fax from Smith’s counsel asking about the status of the appeal. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 10:02 am
And recently, in a Supreme Court case called Smith v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:22 am
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (9th Cir. 1998)]. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:23 am
Comm Social Security Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids SOCIAL SECURITY: COOK, Circuit Judge. [read post]
Arthrex on Remand: Commissioner of Patents Drew Hirshfeld and the Problem of Shadow Acting Officials
24 Mar 2022, 4:39 pm
” Officials have relied recently on delegations to claim the power to lead the Social Security Administration, Bureau of Land Management, and the Fish and Wildlife Service, not to mention to serve as the Deputy Director of Homeland Security. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:28 pm
In Monday’s oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration subsequently appealed the district court's decision, arguing that the ALJ permissibly discounted appellee's testimony and that the district court substituted its own judgment for that of the ALJ in concluding otherwise. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia August 19, 2011Briscoe v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
In October 2018, the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) asked us to revise Rule 202.5(c) to read as follows: The Commission has adopted the policy that in any civil lawsuit brought by it or in any administrative proceeding of an accusatory nature pending before it, a defendant or respondent may consent to a judgment or order in which he admits, denies, or states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings.[7] I agree with the petitioner that… [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:57 am
In Buckley v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:59 am
No action against the United States, the Commissioner of Social Security, or any officer or employee thereof shall be brought under section 1331 . [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 1:34 am
China The State Council of China published the Regulations on Administration of Network Data Security, which will take effect on 1 January 2025. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 8:41 am
What’s this about the “Commissioner of Social Security” and claims arising under subchapter II? [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
Social Security And Taxes Many senior citizens preparing for retirement may not realize that their Social Security income could be taxable under certain conditions. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
WCAB panel decisions are citeable authority, particularly on issues of contemporaneous administrative construction of statutory language. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 1:25 am
Also on 5 December 2024, judgment was handed down by Linden J dismissing the appeal Smith v Poulton & Ors [2024] EWHC 3115 (KB). [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
Smith, Supra; Doe v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
Smith, Supra; Doe v. [read post]
