Search for: "Smith v. Spisak"
Results 1 - 20
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2021, 4:16 pm
Smith, 559 U.S. 314, 332–33 (2010); Smith v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:27 am
Smith; and that (3) his attorney had ineffectively argued in closing that “I feel like I ought to just sit down,” because if the jury chose a death sentence, “I can’t quarrel with that” – referred to as a “Spisak error” after the Court’s opinion in Smith v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:10 am
The Supreme Court itself took a limited view of Mills in Smith v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
Spisak, in which the Supreme Court held that Mills v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 6:06 am
Spisak, in which the Supreme Court held that Mills v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:15 pm
Title: Smith v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 3:06 pm
Mitts reversed the Sixth Circuit and rejected an Ohio death row inmate's challenge to "virtually the same" penalty phase jury instructions considered and upheld last term in Smith v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:25 pm
Spisak (2010); and (2) whether clearly established federal law extends the holding of Beck v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:03 am
Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 7:01 am
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction but sent the reversal of the death penalty back to the Third Circuit ordering it to reconsider the reversal in light of the recent Supreme Court case, Smith v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm
Spisak (2010); and (2) whether clearly established federal law extends the holding of Beck v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 9:06 am
The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, having been told by the Supreme Court to reconsider the Abu-Jamal case in light of Smith v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 4:26 pm
Spisak (2010); and (2) whether clearly established federal law extends the holding of Beck v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
Spisak). [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 6:21 am
Spisak (2010); and (2) whether clearly established federal law extends the holding of Beck v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:38 am
He's crazy as a bedbug, and clearly was at the time of the killings and the time of the trial.None of those things mattered because the legal standards as they've developed (in part at the Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 9:49 am
Spisak. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 5:20 am
Spisak) or failed to request a limiting instruction (Berghuis v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:13 am
The court will revisit the issue, however, in light of this year's SCOTUS case Smith v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:51 am
Smith v. [read post]
