Search for: "Smith v. Spisak"
Results 21 - 40
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2009, 3:00 am
Brief description of the case is from ScotusWiki: Tuesday, Oct. 13 Padilla v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:42 am
The only significant decision out of Washington last week was Smith v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 7:01 am
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction but sent the reversal of the death penalty back to the Third Circuit ordering it to reconsider the reversal in light of the recent Supreme Court case, Smith v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:38 am
He's crazy as a bedbug, and clearly was at the time of the killings and the time of the trial.None of those things mattered because the legal standards as they've developed (in part at the Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:30 am
Spisak (08-724) — unanimity of jury as an issue in finding mitigating evidence in a capital case South Carolina v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 7:19 am
Smith, Smith v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 5:20 am
Spisak) or failed to request a limiting instruction (Berghuis v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:32 pm
Smith v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:15 pm
Title: Smith v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:02 am
[This is the fifth in a series of posts by CrimProf's graduate fellow, Peter Stockburger (University of San Diego Class of 2009), previewing the criminal law and procedure cases scheduled for argument in the U.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Now it appears certain that the high court has decided to hold the Philadelphia prosecutors' petition in abeyance pending the outcome of Smith v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:10 am
The Supreme Court itself took a limited view of Mills in Smith v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 3:00 am
Commonwealth of Kentucky (08-651), and Smith v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:20 am
In the first capital case to be argued this term, Smith v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:27 am
Smith; and that (3) his attorney had ineffectively argued in closing that “I feel like I ought to just sit down,” because if the jury chose a death sentence, “I can’t quarrel with that” – referred to as a “Spisak error” after the Court’s opinion in Smith v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 4:50 am
Spisak. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 9:41 pm
[LINK FIXED] Leading off this belated edition is the Supreme Court’s holding in Smith v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:44 am
Smith, Smith v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
Spisak). [read post]
17 May 2010, 2:14 pm
That case is harder to make for Smith v. [read post]