Search for: "Smith v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 7,855
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2020, 7:02 am by Howard Bashman
And Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 6:00 am by Kalvis Golde
Sineneng-Smith and Kelly v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” Yesterday’s second argument was in Barr v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 7:49 am by Eric Goldman
Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:26 am by Emily Coward
Smith, The Historical and Constitutional Contexts of Jury Reform, 25 Hofstra L. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:26 am by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
Meanwhile, other intellectual property litigation has generally held steady or, as is the case in the patent arena, slowed down as challenges to patents have increased at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in the wake of the Leahy–Smith America Invents Act that took effect in 2012 and new restrictions on patentability set forth in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by Joshua Holt
His high-profile cases include the “trial of the century,” otherwise known as United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am by Matthew Waxman, Samuel Weitzman
Every student of national security law knows about Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:32 pm by Russell Knight
“plaintiff or his or her attorney shall file, at the office of the clerk of the court in which the action is pending, an affidavit showing that the defendant resides or has gone out of this State, or on due inquiry cannot be found, or is concealed within this State, so that process cannot be served upon him or her, and stating the place of residence of the defendant, if known, or that upon diligent inquiry his or her place of residence cannot be ascertained, the… [read post]