Search for: "Smith v. Stevens" Results 41 - 60 of 803
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2007, 9:32 am
A WSJ editorial applauds the Supreme Court’s decision in Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:40 pm
For publication opinions today (4): Bobby Robinson a/k/a Steven Smith v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:42 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Smith, and Michael Stokes Paulsen have all argued that the law’s special treatment of religion, notably the ministerial exception upheld in Hosanna-Tabor v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:17 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
The front page of the New York Times (May 31, 2011) contains a great story by Peter Lattman, quoting me, on the pending case of Simkin v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:30 am by WSLL
KIRBY KIRKLAND; and DAVE AND GLYNDA EDWARDS v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 2:15 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: OP 09-0609, 2010 MT 43, JEREL DRIVER, CHARLES SMITH, ALAN COMBS, ABEL GONZALES, MICHAEL HAMMOND, MARTIN SWAN, CLIFFORD DELGER, DANIEL MILES, TIMOTHY DeHARRERA, WILLIAM PIPER, RONALD HUMMEL, STEVEN WHITECLOUS, CLEVE SPANG, ZANE WYMORE, DARIN GUCKEEN, TOMMY SETH DELLAR, Petitioners, v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 11:15 am by Erin Miller
  Much later in his career, he revisited this issue in statutory form in Smith v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 12:41 pm
" Notably, a petition for a writ of certiorari presenting that issue is currently before the Court in Quarterman v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm by Orin Kerr
 (Michael Smith previewed the case yesterday for this blog.) [read post]
6 May 2016, 4:36 am by Brian Cordery
Brian CorderyBristowsby Steven Willis Judgments from the Courts of England and Wales concerned with the construction of patents will invariably cite the classic formulation of Lord Diplock from Catnic Components v Hill & Smith Ltd [1982] R.P.C. when addressing the identity of the person skilled in the art: “…a patent specification is a unilateral statement by the patentee, in words of his own choosing, addressed to those likely to have a practical interest… [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:45 pm by Priscilla Smith
S 2000bb(b) (1).[3] Smith, 494 U.S. at 887 (equating evaluation of centrality with, inter alia, substantiality) (citing United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Simson, The Uncertain Good of Overruling Employment Division v. [read post]