Search for: "Smith v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 4,976
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
Nortonjnorton@nfllp.com1250 Broadway, 27th Fl.New York, NY 10001(212) 619-5400# # #COMPLAINT: Adrian Dominican Sisters, et al. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 10:50 am
Judge Milan Smith has a fairly good quote in this regard that's both accurate and worth repeating: "Even at a time when the largest law firms in the United States were composed of not many more than one hundred lawyers, Judge Friendly observed that we live in an 'age of increased specialization and high mobility of the bar.' Spanos v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 10:25 am
Back in August, the Third Circuit handed down an unpublished opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 3:04 pm by Bridget Crawford
Reuters reports on the United States Supreme Court’s denial of cert today in Oren Adar v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 10:31 am by Dennis Crouch
The basic framework is that the Constitution requires all “Officers of the United States” to be nominated by the President with “Consent of the Senate. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:21 am by Debra A. McCurdy
Reed Smith's Global Regulatory Enforcement Law Blog recently featured a post on the Fifth Circuit’s ruling in United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:49 am by Debra A. McCurdy
Reed Smith's Global Regulatory Enforcement Law Blog recently featured a post on the Fifth Circuit’s ruling in United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:17 am by Gene Quinn
On Monday, June 25, 2018, the United States Supreme Court granted cert. in Helsinn Healthcare S.A., v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:19 am by Alex Phipps
Georgia from the Supreme Court of the United States, decided on February 21, 2024. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:04 pm by Steve Sady
” The major new case was the ground-breaking decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 8:51 pm by Jane Chong
Ct. 2473 (2014) changes the precedential effect of Smith v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 7:05 am by IPWatchdog
United States Postal Service, a case that asks the nation’s highest court to determine whether the federal government constitutes a “person” for the purposes of instituting review proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]