Search for: "Smith v. United States Postal Service"
Results 1 - 20
of 61
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2024, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 9:59 pm
United States Postal Service (2019)"; "Oil States Energy Services, LLC. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 6:33 am
See, United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am
CNN stated that it was unlikely to pay for all its employees verification costs and author Stephen King voiced that he would leave Twitter if the plan goes ahead. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
United States, 318 U.S. 236, 244 (1943). [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
Canada The defendant’s motion for summary judgment is dismissed in Canadian Union of Postal Workers v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 12:07 pm
National Postal Policy Council v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
U.S. defendants can request access to the evidence, but there is, as Judge Stephen Smith has detailed, increasing deference in federal courts to so-called "law enforcement privilege"—the withholding of information about evidence-gathering techniques during a trial—can extend to software and prevent its examination for errors. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
U.S. defendants can request access to the evidence, but there is, as Judge Stephen Smith has detailed, increasing deference in federal courts to so-called "law enforcement privilege"—the withholding of information about evidence-gathering techniques during a trial—can extend to software and prevent its examination for errors. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 8:49 pm
United States Postal Service"; "Thryv, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:35 pm
Postal Service, Docket No. 17-1594, J. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
In Return Mail Inc v United States Postal Service, 587 U. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm
United States Postal Service, stemming from the postal service’s efforts to invalidate a patent for a machine that scans and processes barcodes containing address information, which speeds up the handling of undeliverable mail. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:55 am
United States Postal Service in which the 6-3 majority held that the U.S. government doesn’t qualify as a “person” for the purposes of petitioning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to institute patent validity proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:55 am
United States Postal Service in which the 6-3 majority held that the U.S. government doesn’t qualify as a “person” for the purposes of petitioning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to institute patent validity proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 8:15 am
United States Postal Service—one of two IP cases the Court heard that week. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 1:48 pm
United States Postal Service Issue: Whether the government is a “person” who may petition to institute review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 7:05 am
United States Postal Service, a case that asks the nation’s highest court to determine whether the federal government constitutes a “person” for the purposes of instituting review proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 7:05 am
United States Postal Service, a case that asks the nation’s highest court to determine whether the federal government constitutes a “person” for the purposes of instituting review proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
