Search for: "Smith v. United States Postal Service" Results 1 - 20 of 59
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
Canada The defendant’s motion for summary judgment is dismissed in Canadian Union of Postal Workers v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 12:07 pm by Andrew Hamm
National Postal Policy Council v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm by Susan Landau
U.S. defendants can request access to the evidence, but there is, as Judge Stephen Smith has detailed, increasing deference in federal courts to so-called "law enforcement privilege"—the withholding of information about evidence-gathering techniques during a trial—can extend to software and prevent its examination for errors. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm by Susan Landau
U.S. defendants can request access to the evidence, but there is, as Judge Stephen Smith has detailed, increasing deference in federal courts to so-called "law enforcement privilege"—the withholding of information about evidence-gathering techniques during a trial—can extend to software and prevent its examination for errors. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm by Mark Walsh
United States Postal Service, stemming from the postal service’s efforts to invalidate a patent for a machine that scans and processes barcodes containing address information, which speeds up the handling of undeliverable mail. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:55 am by Steve Brachmann
United States Postal Service in which the 6-3 majority held that the U.S. government doesn’t qualify as a “person” for the purposes of petitioning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to institute patent validity proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:55 am by Steve Brachmann
United States Postal Service in which the 6-3 majority held that the U.S. government doesn’t qualify as a “person” for the purposes of petitioning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to institute patent validity proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 8:15 am by Stone Law, P.C.
United States Postal Service—one of two IP cases the Court heard that week. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 1:48 pm by karen shephard
United States Postal Service  Issue: Whether the government is a “person” who may petition to institute review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 1:05 pm by Stone Law, P.C.
United States Postal Service, a case that asks the nation’s highest court to determine whether the federal government constitutes a “person” for the purposes of instituting review proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 7:05 am by IPWatchdog
United States Postal Service, a case that asks the nation’s highest court to determine whether the federal government constitutes a “person” for the purposes of instituting review proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 7:05 am by IPWatchdog
United States Postal Service, a case that asks the nation’s highest court to determine whether the federal government constitutes a “person” for the purposes of instituting review proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 1:23 pm by Erik Slobe
United States Postal Service, which will determine if the government is able to initiate review proceedings for patents. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 12:55 pm by Amy Howe
Postal Service (Feb. 20): Whether the government is a “person” who may petition to institute review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act Mission Product Holdings v. [read post]