Search for: "Smith v. United States Postal Service" Results 21 - 40 of 60
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2018, 12:55 pm by Amy Howe
Postal Service (Feb. 20): Whether the government is a “person” who may petition to institute review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act Mission Product Holdings v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 11:16 am by Adam Feldman
Postal Service, in which the court will decide whether the government should be defined as a “person” who can petition for review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, and Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 10:30 am
Postal Service", for which a writ of certiorari has been granted by the U.S. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am by John Elwood
United States Postal Service, 17-1594 Issues: (1) Whether the government is a “person” who may petition to institute review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act; and (2) whether an action under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 3:00 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States Postal Service 17-1594 Issues: (1) Whether the government is a “person” who may petition to institute review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act; and (2) whether an action under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
In the cartoon, Congress passes the flag burning amendment, and Itchy and Scratchy return to TV after the Postal Service is found guilty of copyright infringement. 4. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Submissions may be made by hard copy submitted through a courier or postal service or by e-mail attachment (web15@psu.edu) in Microsoft Word. [read post]
11 May 2015, 2:18 pm by Chuck Cosson
”  With few exceptions, the first 200-odd years of Privacy in the Unites States primarily concerned contexts where the identifiable nature of the data in question was not seriously in doubt. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 4:14 pm by TEI Expert
For example, an apartment complex may be sued because a woman who was assaulted in her unit believes the premises were inadequately secured (Kennedy and Hupp 1998). [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:03 am by Benjamin Wittes
Germany, Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom and Kennedy v. the United Kingdom. [read post]