Search for: "Smith v. United States of America" Results 41 - 60 of 750
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2015, 9:02 am
We have seen companies, from small to large, expanding outside their borders to the rest of Latin America, Africa, and the United States. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 11:48 pm
The United States Supreme Court in 2003 stated in Smith v Doe that the ex post facto application of these Sex Offender Registration Laws was not Punitive in nature, but civil and regulatory intent. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 10:16 am
In re Application of the United States of America for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 3:15 pm
"Bobby Bob" entered into a formal Transfer and Assignment Agreement on January 22, 2008, conditioned on "the approval by a court of competent jurisdiction in accordance with an applicable state transfer statute of a state of the United States of America and must be structured, consummated, closed and approved in accordance with certain applicable laws of the United States of America".Bobby represented that… [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:49 am by Lisa Baird
The Drug & Device Law blog recently posted an analysis of an interesting case, United States ex rel. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:14 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In December 2012, there were 326 million mobile subscriber connections in the United States. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:04 pm
Van Colle (administrator of the estate of GC (deceased)) and another (Original-Respondents and Cross-appellants) v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police (Original Appellant and Cross-respondent) Smith (Respondent) v Chief Constable of Sussex Police (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 50 (30 July 2008) Caldarelli (Appellant) v Court of Naples (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 51 (30 July 2008) R (on the application… [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
FailingerDenying the Poor Access to Court: United States v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:53 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The decision:At the behest of Wirtgen America, Inc., the Director ofthe United States Patent and Trademark Office, actingthrough the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, instituted inter partes review of Caterpillar Paving Products Inc. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
That system sensibly arose from the terrible Wars of Religion, which are the main historical background to religious freedom in the United States. [read post]