Search for: "Smith v. Wade" Results 1 - 20 of 236
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2024, 11:53 am by Steven Calabresi
This can be easily done by issuing a much narrower, and quite correct opinion that Jack Smith lacks defendant's standing in Trump v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Wade, abortion rights have become an invaluable political asset for Democrats. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal To Help 2024 Voters, Meta Says It Will Begin Labeling Political Ads That Use AI-Generated Imagery ABC News – David Klepper (Associated Press) | Published: 11/8/2023 Facebook and Instagram will require political ads running on their platforms to disclose if they were created using artificial intelligence (AI). [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am by Neil H. Buchanan
Roe was a terrible corruption of America’s constitutional jurisprudence.The Guardian also reported this from a different hearing: "Roe v Wade did constitutional cover to the elective killing of unborn children in America, period. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Certainly, asking our judges to be respectful to litigants using other general neutral means (such as addressing a party as "Attorney Smith" or "Plaintiff Smith") does not force anyone to violate their beliefs. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:02 am by Josh Blackman
In an alternate reality, Justice Garland would be on the Supreme Court, Roe v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm by Josh Blackman
Perhaps Smith engaged in a political calculus, and determined that he didn't need to wade into murky insurrection waters. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
The Scottish courts appear to have waded into this conundrum; its resolution determined by the interpretive discourse of forum non conveniens. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:57 am by Austin Sarat
”As he put it, “When the constitutionality of COVID restrictions has been challenged in court, the leading authority cited in their defense is a 1905 Supreme Court decision called Jacobson v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
, (Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 98 (forthcoming 2023)).Simrin Chowdhury, The Economic Implications of Roe v. [read post]