Search for: "Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 105
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2013, 11:36 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
 In rejecting a motion to certify a class, the District Court held that this theory could not satisfy the commonality requirement of Rule 23(a), in the wake of the Supreme Court’s then-recent decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 6:09 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
   This decision is significant for employers because the Court follows the instruction given by the Supreme Court in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 8:44 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
In McReynolds, which was decided after the Court’s ruling in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 6:21 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Maatman, Jr. and Jennifer Riley In recent posts, we have recounted efforts by the plaintiffs’ class action bar to “re-boot” class certification theories to work around the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., No. 11-3639 (7th Cir. 2012), presents a careful analysis of two recurring issues:  first, whether the time limits for an interlocutory appeal of a class action order is statutory or jurisdiction on the one hand or something closer to discretionary on the other; and, second, what effect the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:10 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
Last Friday, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued a significant employment class action decision that may challenge conventional wisdom about the impact of the Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
") The opinion is worth reading for its discussion of Dukes, which begins: The basis of the plaintiffs’ renewed motion for class certification in the present case was the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]