Search for: "Smith v. Winter*" Results 1 - 20 of 166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2009, 10:50 am
Judge Milan Smith has a fairly good quote in this regard that's both accurate and worth repeating: "Even at a time when the largest law firms in the United States were composed of not many more than one hundred lawyers, Judge Friendly observed that we live in an 'age of increased specialization and high mobility of the bar.' Spanos v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 6:35 pm
I gotta agree with Judge Milan Smith in this one. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 3:51 pm
  Maybe the owner just really likes a warm car in the winter (unlikely to be necessary down here in Southern California, but possible). [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:26 am
At issue is whether the officers violated his right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms by conducting a sniff search of his vehicle.Jan. 9 — Alberta — Kaitlyn Ruth Smith v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 6:42 am
SmithCharter of Rights: Smith was a baker at an organization that offered baked goods infused with marijuana to patients suffering from chronic pain. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:59 am
The case is an action by Smith & Nephew to revoke Convatec’s patent relating to antimicrobial wound dressings impregnated with silver.Wound dressing for a Kat? [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
My students Nate Barrett, Charles Linehan, and Michael Smith worked on it, and New Jersey lawyer Daniel Schmutter of Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP was kind enough to agree to be pro bono local counsel — many thanks to him for that! [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
The part heard appeal in Vidal-Hall v Google (hearing to resume on 2 March 2015). [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Retromark Volume V: the last six months in trade marks1. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
 Nikos tells all.* Convatec v Smith & Nephew: why the Court of Appeal was wrongThe IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 on silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here and Darren here). [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Issues under consideration include whether the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights can be relied upon to justify exceptions or limitations beyond those in the Copyright Directive (Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck, C-516/17;  Funke Medien (Case C-469/17) (Advocate General Opinion 25 October 2018 here) and Pelham Case 476/17); and whether a link to a PDF amounts to publication for the purposes of the quotation exception (Spiegel Online GmbH v… [read post]