Search for: "Smithkline Beecham v. Johnson & Johnson-Merck" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm by Bexis
Smithkline Beecham Corp., 658 N.W.2d 127 (Mich. 2003)) or the Sixth Circuit (Garcia v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:12 pm by Gareth
Smithkline Beecham Corp., 960 F.2d 294, 297, 98 (2d Cir. 1992)). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 1:38 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corporation that pharmaceutical sales representatives are not entitled to overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act, as reported by the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 4:43 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Johnson & Johnson * Merck Consumer Pharmaceuticals Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:26 pm
Johnson & Johnson Co., 2002 WL 1009473 (N.J. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 2:28 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp., No. 04-01748-DFH-WTL, slip op. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]