Search for: "Smyth v. Ames" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2016, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
New York (1905), the reproduction cost method that the Supreme Court established in Smyth v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
Some orders have been made on foot of the Defamation Act, 2009 (also here) – see, for example, Lowry v Smyth (background here and here; coverage of the order here), Mellon v Associated Newspapers (coverage here), and Meegan v Associated Newspapers (coverage here) – but Watters v Independent Star [2010] IECC 1 (03 November 2010) remains the only reported judgment on provisions of the Act. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
The paper builds on Siegel 1984 to argue that, by indicating in Smyth v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
The Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (“IPEC”), which superseded the Patents County Court for England and Wales in 2013, is acclimatising nicely to its new name, though it has been a few months since the first decision to come from the IPEC (Bocacina Ltd v Boca Cafes Ltd [2013] EWHC 3090 (IPEC)) reached the database of the British and Irish Legal Information Institute BAILII: this decision was reported on by Darren Smyth on the IPKat back in… [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 3:26 am by Broc Romanek
I am sure the SEC was heavily lobbied by US investment banks, lawyers, and accounting firms that have lucrative business interests in keeping capital flowing. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 10:45 pm
Friday FantasiesA round-up post of week’s news and forthcoming events.Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One)GuestKat Rosie Burbidge recaps the annual IBIL and MARQUES event, which enabled attendees to learn first-hand about daily life at the courts.HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage AudioDavid Brophy discusses this case, which dealt with jurisdiction over a UK/ EU trademark infringement and passing-off dispute, when the damages… [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
It has been re-affirmed in the Court of Appeal in modern times in Holley v Smyth [1998] 1 All ER 852 and post the Human Rights Act in Greene v Associated Newspapers [2005] 2 WLR 281. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 3:44 pm
| Friday Fantasies| Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One)| HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio| Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme| Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 2:03 pm by Alexandre Miura
Deciding to leave and take on this new challenge has been incredibly difficult for me, and I am immensely proud of what we have achieved together. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:05 am by GuestPost
We are pleased to welcome the latest in our series of reponses to the judgment in A, B & C v. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 6:07 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
El Tribunal Supremo de Puerto Rico en James Patrick Smyth Delgado, et al. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:22 am
 The Kat is question is Darren Smyth (EIP), who only a few days ago rested his posting paws after a tiring six-month stint as one of three guest Kats for the first half of the year and who now, to the great pleasure of us all, has just presented the blog with a hot-off-the-press analysis of this morning's ruling of Judge Birss QC, sitting as a Patents Court judge, in Samsung Electronics UK v Apple Inc [2012] EWHC 1882 (Pat), which is fully illustrated and fun to read… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:22 am
 The Kat is question is Darren Smyth (EIP), who only a few days ago rested his posting paws after a tiring six-month stint as one of three guest Kats for the first half of the year and who now, to the great pleasure of us all, has just presented the blog with a hot-off-the-press analysis of this morning's ruling of Judge Birss QC, sitting as a Patents Court judge, in Samsung Electronics UK v Apple Inc [2012] EWHC 1882 (Pat), which is fully illustrated and fun to read… [read post]