Search for: "Snepp v. United States" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2019, 2:29 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Rather, under well-established Supreme Court precedent, Snepp v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:48 pm by Jack Goldsmith, Marty Lederman
District Court for the District of Columbia, on behalf of the United States for breaches of the two NDAs. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm by Susan Hennessey, Helen Klein Murillo
This provision makes it a crime to steal, sell, or convey “any record, voucher, money, or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency thereof. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 12:04 pm by Sean Gallagher
Instead, as a DOJ spokesperson said in a press release, "under well-established Supreme Court precedent [in the case] Snepp v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 1:00 pm by Jack Goldsmith, Oona Hathaway
In a short per curiam opinion, the Court concluded in Snepp v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:13 pm by Matthew Kahn
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
But calls to commit a specific crime are generally not constitutionally protected, see United States v. [read post]