Search for: "Soling v. New York State" Results 21 - 40 of 2,855
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2017, 11:45 am by Robert Loeb
On February 2, 2017, the New York Appellate Division, First Department, issued a decision in Gordon v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 3:40 am by Cari Rincker
Most people are not aware that there are different types of custody in New York State. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 6:36 am
Regarded by some as my no-fault nemesis, Brooklyn attorney Ray Zuppa began this campaign in June 2008 by filing a class action "bad faith" action in New York State Supreme Court, New York County, seeking only declaratory relief. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:21 am by Michael Kaplen
As a Vice President of the New York State Academy of Trial Lawyers, a statewide bar association representing attorneys,members of the judiciary and law professors throughout New York State, it was my honor to represent the Academy and provide testimony to the New York State Senate Insurance Committee earlier this week that was examining issues of No Fault fraud and ways to "reform" New York's No Fault… [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:42 pm
A copy of the Kristin Booth Glen's opinion, published in the New York Law Journal, page 27, today, is available here and the front-page article is available here, and continued here.This ruling is consistent with a February 2008 New York appellate decision in Martinez v. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 6:20 pm by Mark Graber
  The Supreme Court in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:37 am by Sanford F. Young
Bulson, 19 N.Y.3d 347 (2012), the New York Court of Appeals recently reiterated the long-established New York court-made rule barring the recovery of damages for emotional distress injuries and other “non-pecuniary” (i.e., non-monetary) losses in legal malpractice cases. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:37 am by Sanford F. Young
Bulson, 19 N.Y.3d 347 (2012), the New York Court of Appeals recently reiterated the long-established New York court-made rule barring the recovery of damages for emotional distress injuries and other “non-pecuniary” (i.e., non-monetary) losses in legal malpractice cases. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:37 am by Sanford F. Young
Bulson, 19 N.Y.3d 347 (2012), the New York Court of Appeals recently reiterated the long-established New York court-made rule barring the recovery of damages for emotional distress injuries and other “non-pecuniary” (i.e., non-monetary) losses in legal malpractice cases. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:37 am by Sanford F. Young
Bulson, 19 N.Y.3d 347 (2012), the New York Court of Appeals recently reiterated the long-established New York court-made rule barring the recovery of damages for emotional distress injuries and other “non-pecuniary” (i.e., non-monetary) losses in legal malpractice cases. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:38 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
New York, invalidated a similar New York law allegedly justified by the police power, explaining that "no definition of [the police power], and no urgency for its use, can authorize a State to exercise it in regard to a subject-matter which has been confided exclusively to the discretion of Congress by the Constitution." [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 7:56 am by Phillips & Associates
A bill pending in the New York State Senate, S3267, would amend the New York State Human Rights Law with similar provisions. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:17 pm
As stated above, the Court of Appeals’ decision eliminates a legal defense to New York common law actions arising from alleged wrongdoing in connection with the marketing or sale of securities. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 3:21 am by Peter Mahler
The Re/Max Case The dispute in Re/Max of New York, Inc. v Weber, Short Form Order, Index No. 600848/16 [Sup Ct Nassau County Nov. 29, 2016], centered on two, diametrically opposed narratives surrounding a 1998 transaction in which a stockholder with 15 shares representing a 4% equity stake sold his interest to the defendant, Weber, who served as president and director of the company in the business of franchising real estate brokers. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 3:35 am
Additional facts were not available at the New York Sun site (but are at links below).It is worth pointing out here that anonymous speech is well protected under the First Amendment in accordance with the Supreme Court's ruling in McIntyre v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 9:49 am by Colin B. Willmott
In Carlson, the New York Court of Appeals reaffirmed that the issued or delivered requirement of Section 3420 did not solely pertain to policies issued in New York. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by Matthew Lerner
The New York Court of Appeals will hear arguments next Tuesday (September 14, 2010) in Kirschner v.  [read post]