Search for: "Sonner v. Premier Nutrition Corp."
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2020, 8:32 am
Premier Nutrition Corp., __ F.3d __, No. 18-15890, 2020 WL 3263043 (9th Cir. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 8:32 am
Premier Nutrition Corp., __ F.3d __, No. 18-15890, 2020 WL 3263043 (9th Cir. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 12:36 pm
Sonner v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 6:58 am
Premier Nutrition Corp., No. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 11:48 am
Premier Nutrition Corp., 2016 WL 1534784, No. 13-cv-01271 (N.D. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 11:32 am
Premier Nutrition Corp. case. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 10:10 am
Premier Nutrition Corp., 971 F.3d 834 (9th Cir. 2020), in which held that “a federal court must apply traditional legal principles before awarding restitution under the UCL and CLRA” and “state law cannot expand or limit a federal court’s equitable authority. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 3:03 pm
Premier Nutrition Corp., 49 F.4th 1300 (9th Cir. 2022) (Sonner II) (same plaintiff re-filed her case in state court (Alameda County); defendant's motion to enjoin state-court proceeding was denied due to uncertainty over jurisdictional issue) Guzman v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 11:25 am
” The UCL and FAL claims were equitable, and under Sonner v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 10:22 am
Premier Nutrition Corp., 971 F.3d 834 (9th Cir. 2020) and its progeny, everything but the CLRA claim for damages should be dismissed because these equitable claims were only available if legal claims failed. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:02 am
Premier Nutrition Corp., 971 F.3d 834, 841 (9th Cir. 2020). [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 12:14 pm
Bridge v. [read post]
