Search for: "Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios" Results 1 - 20 of 85
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2019, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 US 417, 431 (1984). [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 2:09 pm
Nevertheless, it is no leap to apply the framework of similar technology-based cases to our analysis of Gonzales’s liability.In Sony Corp. of America v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
Miller, New York City, for petitioners. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Gasaway, University of Georgia School of Law; Professor Michael Madison, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Professor Ruth Okediji, University of Oklahoma Law School; Alfred C. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 5:18 am by Wes Anderson
It was Sony and its BETAMAX format that successfully took on the movie studios in the Supreme Court case Sony Corp. of America v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 10:52 pm by Brian Frye
Copyright scholars are unusually familiar with Betamax, due to Sony Corp. of America v. [read post]