Search for: "Sosa v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 245
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  In the first, United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:42 am by John Bellinger
On Friday, the DC Circuit held, in a 2-1 panel decision in Doe v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 10:18 pm by Patricia Salkin
Save our Scenic Area v Skamania County, 352 P. 3d 177 (WA 6/11/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, moratoria [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 10:02 am by John Bellinger, Andy Wang
Second, the dissent distinguished RJR Nabisco and Morrison on the grounds that they are not “ATS-specific precedents,” and that the ATS-specific cases Kiobel and Sosa v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:10 pm by Marco Simons
After this position was thoroughly repudiated by the Supreme Court in Sosa v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 6:26 am
This essay continues their look into the Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:00 pm by John Bellinger
  As I noted previously, the Ninth Circuit is poised to rule on the issue of corporate liability in Sarei v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Julian Ku
Although the government initially sought to limit the ATS to a jurisdictional grant only that did not itself authorize any private rights of action, the Court in Sosa v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 11:49 pm
The question of corporate liability under the ATS was left unsettled by the Supreme Court in Sosa v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:20 pm by Kenneth Anderson
With circuits having gone different directions on this issue, this perhaps tees up a SCOTUS review that would revisit its last, delphic pronouncement on the Alien Tort Statute in Sosa v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 1:18 am
In this analysis, I compare Sosa with Hamdan v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:38 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
“Cualquier persona es vulnerable a ser víctima de robo de identidad. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:12 am
Verdugo-Urquidez (1989), in which the Court held that 4th Amendment was not violated by the overseas warrantless search of property belonging to Mexican nationals with no ties to the United States; United States v. [read post]