Search for: "Sosa v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2009, 11:35 pm
This was made clear in his decision in Sosa v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:30 am
Supreme Court (above left) set out in Sosa v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:09 pm by Anthony Colangelo
Smith – an early piracy case on which the Court relied in Sosa v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendant states that a successful result in the Underlying Claim could not be established since plaintiff stated that the door locks were functioning properly on the day of the incident and plaintiff did not know who attacked him (plaintiff EBT, at 17, 19). [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:26 pm
  The circumstances for this week's Kiobel hearing therefore seems quite different than the context for the Supreme Court's earlier review of the ATS in Sosa v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
After a brief surge in litigation, the Supreme Court significantly curtailed the ATS’s effectiveness tremendously in Sosa v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:21 am by interns
McMillan has precedents at the ready: Sosa, Quirin, and, unsurprisingly, Justice Stevens’ opinion in Hamdan v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:18 am by John Bellinger
  In its seminal 2004 opinion in Sosa, the Supreme Court had specifically left open the question of whether the ATS applies to non-state actors, such as corporations. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:11 am by Eugene Kontorovich
Before responding to particular participants, I should introduce an important intervening precedent – United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 7:18 am
  Anderson claims that the issue is left open by the Court's 2004 ruling in Sosa v. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:13 am by jonathanturley
” Scalia repeatedly warned about the application of international law as precedent in U.S. cases, including in his concurring opinion in Sosa v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 1:47 pm by Trey Childress
  When the Supreme Court issued its most recent opinion on the statute in Sosa v. [read post]