Search for: "Sosna v. State of Iowa"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2013, 7:22 am
Iowa, 419 U. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
Id.; Sosna v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
” Sosna v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 7:50 am
See Gilmor, 2011 WL 111238, at *6 (citing Sosna v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:23 am
Nevertheless, the court cited Sosna v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Reis followed Sosna v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 1:05 pm
See also Sosna v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at… [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 6:40 am
See Sosna v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 6:40 am
See Sosna v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 11:39 am
Pugh and Sosna v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:20 pm
Iowa (1975). [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 2:42 pm
” Sosna v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 1:09 pm
Iowa — and otherwise commandeering state courts and state agencies to carry out a federal child-placement program. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 11:59 am
Iowa — and otherwise commandeering state courts and state agencies to carry out a federal child-placement program. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
” The state has designated Oklahoma v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed in relevant part, rejecting the states’ nondelegation challenge; the court also concluded other claims were time-barred because the states acted more than a decade after CMS promulgated the rule. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am
Constitution; and (2) whether ICWA's placement preferences exceed Congress's Article I authority by invading the arena of child placement — the "virtually exclusive province of the States," as stated in Sosna v. [read post]
