Search for: "Sours v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 419
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2013, 8:01 am
That’s exactly what happened in Ingres Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 9:48 am
In 2019, in Nieves v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:46 pm
Existing Sources-Must incorporate GHG related requirements into their operating permits (Title V). [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 3:48 am
(Gonzales v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:41 am
A recent Ninth Circuit decision in Thunder Studios v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 6:00 am
One is being appealed in the normal way by the Secretary of State for Education, but the other may lead to a fundamental rethink of the Scottish justice system. [read post]
10 Nov 2024, 9:00 pm
In 303 Creative v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 7:16 am
POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:02 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:40 pm
The IPKat is pleased to host the following guest post by Katfriend Alessandro Cerri regarding the US Supreme Court’s decision in the Jack Daniel’s v VIP IP dispute. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:25 am
SWS Group Inc., February 23, 2018, per curiam); Verition Partners Master Fund LTD v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 11:27 am
[T]he relationship . . . began to sour in 2002. . . . [read post]
1 May 2017, 8:04 am
Primo Broodstock, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 11:55 pm
Indeed, after 1975 the Court delivered a series of landmark judgments, including, for example, Golder v UK (1975), Engel v the Netherlands (1976), Tyrer v UK (1978), Marckx v Belgium (1979) and Sunday Times v UK (1979). [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 11:47 am
” In Pennsylvania, however, the tort has a state-specific formulation based on a 1904 Pennsylvania Supreme Court case (Marshall v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 8:45 am
Elrom v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:02 am
* Mattel's lawsuit against MGA over the Bratz dolls has gone sour for Mattel in a big way. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:57 pm
Riscili v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 8:56 am
In Gibb v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 8:19 am
In a letter posted on one of China's major web portals, Sina.com, Zong said a trademark-license contract must be approved by the Trademark Office of the State Administration For Industry and Commerce but he never submitted the original which restricts China's largest drink producer from independently expanding. [read post]
