Search for: "Sours v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 470
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2017, 11:40 pm
Beer Pong shots c/o WikipediaA recent High Court decision (Breakthrough Funding v Nearby Media [2017] EWHC 2271 ch) follows on from an interim injunction which was granted by Arnold J earlier in the year. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:09 am
Thus, defendant’s theory that plaintiff breached a duty of care to it by choosing to apply for attorneys’ fees via a sanctions motion instead of a motion under § 285 amounts to no more than an allegation that plaintiff made an error in judgment, which does not state a cause of action for malpractice (see Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738 [1985]; Sitomer v Goldweber Epstein, LLP, 139 AD3d 642 [1st Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 906… [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 3:56 am
Khan v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 2:58 am
Justice Scarpulla’s decision agreed with the Green estate’s position in critical part, stating that while the “evidence here depicts a transaction that, to the objective observer, may raise a concern as to the transaction’s fairness,” the Gourary estate failed to submit evidence adequate to support its claims: Unfortunately, the key players to the subject transaction passed away before they could provide any probative evidence. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 1:30 am
Like on Christmas morning, the CJEU finally delivered its judgment earlier this month.As discussed above, the case of Consorzio Tutela Aceto Balsamico di Modena v Balema GmbH concerned the registration "Aceto Balsamico di Modena" (PGI application here) in relation to a balsamic vinegar which is produced in the Modena region of Italy. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 1:30 am
Like on Christmas morning, the CJEU finally delivered its judgment earlier this month.As discussed above, the case of Consorzio Tutela Aceto Balsamico di Modena v Balema GmbH concerned the registration "Aceto Balsamico di Modena" (PGI application here) in relation to a balsamic vinegar which is produced in the Modena region of Italy. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 8:31 am
Lee v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
January 5, 2023 | By: Ryan Kennedy On November 7, 2022, the United States District Court for the District of Virginia decided the case of Harrell v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Mark Baptist Church of Pittsburg v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:28 am
It should also state that the employer will not tolerate any misuse of its social media networks that would breach the confidentiality of it or its clients or cause embarrassment to them. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 4:29 am
Some states have. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 7:30 pm
That's what happened in Hilton v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:20 am
Union, AFL-CIO, 91 AD3d at 768-769; Naval v Lehman College, 303 AD2d at 662; Kourkoumelis v Arnel, 238 AD2d at 313). [read post]
7 May 2007, 10:10 am
Jarvis v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 6:45 am
Stanford student David Muraskin previews the first case to be heard this morning, Montejo v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 11:50 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit* in Summit Petroleum Corporation v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 4:05 am
” Ryan v New York Tel. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 7:05 am
Caudle, The Huffington Post More Blog Entries: Graf v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 8:18 am
Elven Joe SwisherUnited States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 5:05 pm
By Eric Goldman New Mexico v. [read post]
