Search for: "South Carolina Employment Law Letter" Results 1 - 20 of 168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2019, 5:44 am by Cathy Hamilton
The post South Carolina Employment Discrimination appeared first on King Law. [read post]
For more information on the South Carolina Pregnancy Accommodations Act, see the August issue of South Carolina Employment Law Letter. [read post]
For more information on the South Carolina Pregnancy Accommodations Act, see the August issue of South Carolina Employment Law Letter. [read post]
For more information on the South Carolina Pregnancy Accommodations Act, see the August issue of South Carolina Employment Law Letter. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 10:36 am by Alfred Brophy
The University of South Carolina is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:23 am by HR Hero Alerts
South Carolina Employment Law Letter, Washington Employment Law Letter, and Federal Employment Law Letter will continue to follow this important case and provide analysis on the outcome and what it means to employers. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 5:30 am by Gregory Forman
South Carolina Family Court Rule 7 creates various evidentiary exceptions to the general rules of hearsay.   [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:10 pm by HR Hero Alerts
Morgan is a shareholder at McNair Law Firm and is an editor of the South Carolina Employment Law Letter [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 7:00 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
As noted in the Cleveland Plain Dealer, variations of Light’s letter ran in Ohio’s Mansfield News Journal on Jan. 13, with Light claiming an address in Mansfield; in New Mexico’s Ruidoso News on Jan. 12, claiming an address in Three Rivers; in South Carolina’s The Sun News on Jan. 18, claiming an address in Myrtle Beach; and in the Daily News Leader of Staunton, Virginia on Jan. 15, claiming an address in Waynesboro. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 6:52 pm by Seth Borden
The Acting General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board has responded to the joint letter by the Attorneys General of Arizona, South Carolina, South Dakota and Utah proclaiming their intent to defend their state constitutions against any NLRB litigation to invalidate recent secret ballot amendments. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 9:18 am by Nassiri Law
Charleston Charter School is relevant to workers here in California because just like here, South Carolina is an at-will employment state. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:56 am
This past election cycle four states, Arizona, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Utah, had ballot measures that would ban card check legislation--that is, sought to preempt the controversial Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA). [read post]
5 May 2011, 6:08 am
The complaint claims Boeing is trying to open the line in South Carolina as unlawful retaliation against the union for its lawful strikes and protected concerted activity. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 1:32 pm by Seth Borden
The Senator's release also makes express reference to the recent letter sent by the Acting General Counsel of the NLRB to four states – South Carolina, Arizona, South Dakota and Utah -- regarding their state constitutional amendments making secret ballot elections mandatory: The threatening letter was written by acting NLRB general counsel, Lafe Solomon, who has not been confirmed by the Senate. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:41 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Wexler We previously blogged about the scathing letter sent by the chief legal officers representing the states of Alabama, Colorado, Georgia, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, South Carolina, Utah and West Virginia to the five Commissioners of the U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:28 pm by TDot
EIC and I are both currently down in South Carolina for the ABA Law Student Division‘s Fall “Super Circuit” meeting for the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Circuits, scheduled to take place tomorrow at the Charleston School of Law. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 8:31 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
On July 24, 2013, the chief legal officers representing the states of Alabama, Colorado, Georgia, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, South Carolina, Utah and West Virginia sent a joint letter to the five commissioners of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) with a clear message:  enough is enough. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 8:31 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
On July 24, 2013, the chief legal officers representing the states of Alabama, Colorado, Georgia, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, South Carolina, Utah and West Virginia sent a joint letter to the five commissioners of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) with a clear message:  enough is enough. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 11:37 am by Amanda Pickens
Not every class action court filing in North and South Carolina becomes a full-length post on our blog. [read post]