Search for: "South Carolina v. Baker"
Results 21 - 40
of 91
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
(cloth, $24.95, ebook).Baker, H. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 5:45 am
Mungin, a black Baptist minister, was threatened with deadly force and told to leave a famous South Carolina barbecue restaurant—all because its owner held to the belief that the races should be kept strictly separated. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
Heigel held that South Carolina’s refusal to list the female spouse of a biological child on that child’s birth certificate, when it does so for husbands, “is violative of Plaintiffs’ fundamental right to marriage and other protected liberties. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
In 1972, the United States Supreme Court issued Baker v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 12:23 pm
We both grew up in the Carolinas — North Carolina for him and South Carolina for me. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Searle & Co., 979 F.2d 1001, 1003 (4th Cir. 1992) (applying South Carolina law); Muzichuck v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 10:13 am
The owner of the Piggie Park restaurant in South Carolina was no exception. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:00 am
There is nothing in the Federal Arbitration Act that precludes either of these determinations by the Supreme Court of South Carolina”) (citations omitted); see also id. at 452-53 (Breyer, J.) [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm
The Roberts Court and the Future of Election Law, 57 South Carolina Law Review 669 (2006) (symposium on voting rights) The Uncertain Congressional Power to Ban State Felon Disenfranchisement Laws, 49 Howard Law Journal 767 (2006) (part of voting rights symposium) Lessons from the Clash Between Campaign Finance Laws and the Blogosphere , 11 Nexus Law Journal (forthcoming 2006) (essay part of symposium on blogging and the law) How Much is… [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:32 pm
Because legislatures get to make those decisions and the Legislature in South Carolina might make that decision one way and the Legislature in California a different one. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 10:36 am
We also represent a putative intervenor (the Catawba River Water Supply Project) in an original action, South Carolina v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
” Constitution of South Carolina, March 19, 1778 (South Carolina Copyright Act, March 26, 1784). [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
In fact, Nevada specifically prohibits discrimination in “baker[ies]. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Or. 1989).South Carolina: Odom v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:42 am
Susan V. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
Baker or Reno v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 12:28 pm
”] From Doe v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:47 am
Baker v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Carolina Foam Industries, Inc., 935 P.2d 876, 883, (Ariz. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 7:00 am
South Carolina v. [read post]
