Search for: "South Carolina v. Baker" Results 21 - 40 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
Race, Identity, and Tribal Citizenship on the Baker Roll of Eastern Cherokees, 1924-1930, Mikaëla M. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 10:02 am
Oklahoma is the 11th most church-going state, although it’s still behind new gay-marriage jurisdictions like Utah (5th), North Carolina (tied for 7th), and South Carolina (tied for 1st). [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 5:45 am by SHG
Mungin, a black Baptist minister, was threatened with deadly force and told to leave a famous South Carolina barbecue restaurant—all because its owner held to the belief that the races should be kept strictly separated. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Heigel held that South Carolina’s refusal to list the female spouse of a biological child on that child’s birth certificate, when it does so for husbands, “is violative of Plaintiffs’ fundamental right to marriage and other protected liberties. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 12:23 pm by SCOTUSblog
We both grew up in the Carolinas — North Carolina for him and South Carolina for me. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:39 am by Gregory Forman
In 1972, the United States Supreme Court issued Baker v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Searle & Co., 979 F.2d 1001, 1003 (4th Cir. 1992) (applying South Carolina law); Muzichuck v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
 There is nothing in the Federal Arbitration Act that precludes either of these determinations by the Supreme Court of South Carolina”) (citations omitted);  see also id. at 452-53 (Breyer, J.) [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm by Rick Hasen
The Roberts Court and the Future of Election Law, 57 South Carolina Law Review 669 (2006) (symposium on voting rights) The Uncertain Congressional Power to Ban State Felon Disenfranchisement Laws, 49 Howard Law Journal 767 (2006) (part of voting rights symposium) Lessons from the Clash Between Campaign Finance Laws and the Blogosphere , 11 Nexus Law Journal (forthcoming 2006) (essay part of symposium on blogging and the law) How Much is… [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:32 pm
Because legislatures get to make those decisions and the Legislature in South Carolina might make that decision one way and the Legislature in California a different one. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 10:36 am
We also represent a putative intervenor (the Catawba River Water Supply Project) in an original action, South Carolina v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
” Constitution of South Carolina, March 19, 1778 (South Carolina Copyright Act, March 26, 1784). [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 7:30 am by Lisa Grumet
In fact, Nevada specifically prohibits discrimination in “baker[ies]. [read post]