Search for: "South Carolina v. Baker" Results 21 - 40 of 92
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am by Dan Carvajal
Supreme Court to grant certiorari in the South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 10:08 am by David Markus
They both knew there was little opportunity for economic advancement for African-Americans in South Carolina. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 5:45 am by SHG
Mungin, a black Baptist minister, was threatened with deadly force and told to leave a famous South Carolina barbecue restaurant—all because its owner held to the belief that the races should be kept strictly separated. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 2:56 am by NCC Staff
John Marshall HarlanOn July 9, 1868, Louisiana and South Carolina voted to ratify the amendment, after they had rejected it a year earlier. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 7:01 am
"  In April, 2017, the South Carolina African American Heritage Commission released a mobile app, "The Green Book of South Carolina," that pays homage to Victor Green's creation. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Heigel held that South Carolina’s refusal to list the female spouse of a biological child on that child’s birth certificate, when it does so for husbands, “is violative of Plaintiffs’ fundamental right to marriage and other protected liberties. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:20 pm by Gregory Forman
It establishes important law on the issue of standing of non-parents to seek visitation in South Carolina. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:57 am by Jamie Baker
Straut, Due Process Disestablishment: Why Lawrence v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 12:55 pm by Scott Bomboy
South Carolina Coastal Council (1992), the Penn Central v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 24, 25 and 26 January 2017, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption, Hughes and Hodge) heard the joined appeals in the cases of Flood v Times Newspapers, Miller v Associated Newspapers and Frost v MGN. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 1:36 am by NCC Staff
South Carolina Coastal Council (1992), which said that the denial of all economic use of a property by a government regulation was a taking under the Fifth Amendment and required just compensation. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 2:00 am by NCC Staff
South Carolina Coastal Council (1992), which said that the denial of all economic use of a property by a government regulation was a taking under the Fifth Amendment and required just compensation. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 10:56 am by NCC Staff
John Marshall Harlan On July 9, 1868, Louisiana and South Carolina voted to ratify the amendment, after they had rejected it a year earlier. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 10:51 am by Amanda Pickens
Not every class action court filing in North and South Carolina becomes a full-length post on our blog. [read post]