Search for: "South Carolina v. Baker"
Results 81 - 96
of 96
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2010, 4:47 am
Baker v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 5:06 am
The South Carolina Supreme Court, in Moore v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm
Yohn Jr. in Teva v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
. – Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:21 pm
Down in good ole Tallahassee this afternoon, Florida AG Bill McCollum filed a 22-page complaint on behalf of himself and the AG's of 12 other states (South Carolina, Nebraska, Texas, Utah, Louisiana, Alabama, Michigan, Colorado, Pennsylvania, Washington, Idaho, and South Dakota). [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:00 am
On the one hand, Bush v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 5:54 am
Baker-Chaput, — So.3d —-, 34 Fla. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
"o o April 1, 2009 decision hereo o SCOTUS docket hereo o SCOTUSwiki hereo o Noted here: Baker Hostetler; Colorado Employment Law Blog; ConstangyArgued - Awaiting DecisionAT&T v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 1:02 am
A legal U.S. resident, the Qatar native was declared an "enemy combatant" by the Bush administration and held without charges for more than five years at a Navy brig in South Carolina. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 6:53 am
Take, for instance, the Michigan v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 4:22 pm
Since that decision, Baze v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Or. 1989).South Carolina: Odom v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 10:36 am
We also represent a putative intervenor (the Catawba River Water Supply Project) in an original action, South Carolina v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
Connecticut (1965); South Carolina v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
Connecticut (1965); South Carolina v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:32 pm
Because legislatures get to make those decisions and the Legislature in South Carolina might make that decision one way and the Legislature in California a different one. [read post]
