Search for: "South Carolina v. Baker"
Results 81 - 99
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
(Docket Report) District Court E D North Carolina: Infringement sale of equipment creating ‘long-lasting business relationship’ creates irreparable harm sufficient to warrant preliminary injunction: Morris & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
More than 40 of the sites are in North Carolina. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:21 pm
Down in good ole Tallahassee this afternoon, Florida AG Bill McCollum filed a 22-page complaint on behalf of himself and the AG's of 12 other states (South Carolina, Nebraska, Texas, Utah, Louisiana, Alabama, Michigan, Colorado, Pennsylvania, Washington, Idaho, and South Dakota). [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:00 am
On the one hand, Bush v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Charlotte Observer, March 8, 2010 Norfolk Southern Railway Co. has agreed to pay a $4 million penalty for a 2005 chlorine and diesel fuel spill that killed nine people and polluted a creek in western South Carolina, the federal government said Monday. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
Thermo-Ply (PATracer) Honeywell – Patentee appeals finding of patent invalidity under on-sale bar provisions of § 102(b): Honeywell v Nikon (PATracer) Nalco – Nalco appeals from grant of preliminary injunction against it from infringement patent directed to method of removing or transferring metals and/or amines from crude oil: Baker Hughes v Nalco (PATracer) Nutriset - Access to food now an IP issue? [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 5:54 am
Baker-Chaput, — So.3d —-, 34 Fla. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
"o o April 1, 2009 decision hereo o SCOTUS docket hereo o SCOTUSwiki hereo o Noted here: Baker Hostetler; Colorado Employment Law Blog; ConstangyArgued - Awaiting DecisionAT&T v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 1:02 am
A legal U.S. resident, the Qatar native was declared an "enemy combatant" by the Bush administration and held without charges for more than five years at a Navy brig in South Carolina. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 6:53 am
Take, for instance, the Michigan v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 4:22 pm
Since that decision, Baze v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Or. 1989).South Carolina: Odom v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 10:36 am
We also represent a putative intervenor (the Catawba River Water Supply Project) in an original action, South Carolina v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 7:01 am
Baker. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 7:59 am
Box 14615 Baton Rouge, LA 70898 Phone: (504) 882-6503 Fax: (504) 882-5347 AARP Louisiana 301 Main Street, # 1012 Baton Rouge, LA 70825 Phone: (225) 381-2940 Fax: (225) 387-3400 E-mail: la@aarp.org Web: http://www.aarp.orgstates/la ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Disability Law Resource Project 2323 South Shepard Boulevard, Suite 1000 Houston, TX 77019 Phone: (713) 520-0232 (V/TTY); (800) 949-4232 (V/TTY/Toll Free) E-mail: dlrp@ilru.org Web:… [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
Connecticut (1965); South Carolina v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
Connecticut (1965); South Carolina v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:32 pm
Because legislatures get to make those decisions and the Legislature in South Carolina might make that decision one way and the Legislature in California a different one. [read post]
