Search for: "South Carolina v. Brown" Results 1 - 20 of 365
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2024, 3:19 pm by Amy Howe
South Carolina Conference of the NAACP, a court divided on ideological lines threw out a federal district court’s ruling finding that a congressional district on t [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm by Amy Howe
In South Carolina, for example, exit polls in the 2020 election indicated that at least 90% of Black voters supported Democrat Joe Biden. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:00 pm by SCOTUSblog
South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, and Brown v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Distinctions can be justified in some cases. 'The doctrine of the equality of States . . . does not bar . . . remedies for local evils which have subsequently appeared,' (citation to South Carolina v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
The article exposes how the federal government played a role in extending racial segregation and discrimination by funding segregated schools up to 10 years after the Brown v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
The Bachman's warbler from South Carolina and Florida was no doubt helped along its way by modern farming methods. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:44 pm by Ilya Somin
That's true in Oregon, as I mentioned, but also New Mexico, South Carolina, Nebraska, the list goes on of states that provide compensation under the Fifth Amendment because they understand the Fifth Amendment to require compensation. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 7:23 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Elliott, chairman, et al. that challenged segregation and was one of the cases included in the Supreme Court case, Brown v Board of Education of Topeka, KS (1954). [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
The Supreme Court of South Carolina discussed this fact pattern in State v. [read post]