Search for: "South Carolina v. Brown" Results 181 - 200 of 359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:48 am by Gregory Forman
Currently the legal status of same sex relationships in South Carolina is controlled by S.C. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Distinctions can be justified in some cases. 'The doctrine of the equality of States . . . does not bar . . . remedies for local evils which have subsequently appeared,' (citation to South Carolina v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller, Scott) Modified to add filers on 11/29/2017 (znmw). [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller, Scott) Modified to add filers on 11/29/2017 (znmw). [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 12:53 pm
But the earliest use of "scintilla" that I could find was the dissent of a Judge Grimke of the Constitutional Court of Appeals of South Carolina in Frost v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 4:45 pm by Joy Waltemath
Dismissing the non-Title VII claims, the district court agreed with the magistrate that the Equal Employment Opportunity Act expressly subjected federal agencies to Title VII’s prohibitions and, as held by the Supreme Court in Brown v General Servs Admin, Title VII is “an exclusive, pre-emptive administrative and judicial scheme for the redress of federal employment discrimination. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
  Restatement Third §2 would be a significant revision of Alaska law - sort of like what just happened in South Carolina.ArizonaLower Arizona courts have followed the Restatement Third §2 on the rationale that, in general, Arizona law has adopted the principles of the Restatement of Torts. [read post]