Search for: "South Carolina v. Gathers" Results 21 - 40 of 95
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2011, 10:21 am
The Turner case involved a father in South Carolina who was held in contempt and jailed for failure to pay child support. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:16 am by Joel R. Brandes
Colores left Mexico with I.R.C. and traveled to South Carolina, where her mother was vacationing. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 11:13 am by Bryan J. Coffey
This case out of the South Carolina Supreme Court gave generously to policyholders in a number of ways this year (giving us the opportunity to post in this blog again and again and again). [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:13 am by Lyle Denniston
The case involves a South Carolina man who has been put in jail for contempt three times for failure to pay child support.  [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:24 pm
ENS reports that she had the Council authorize a response to the Episcopal Forum of South Carolina, which explained that "there are canonical limits to how her office and the Executive Council can intervene" in the situation there. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 9:04 am
Employment law experts have been paying close attention to how federal courts are interpreting the 2009 Supreme Court case of Ashcroft v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 5:26 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
According to the Insurance Information Institute, other states that hold both commercial servers and social hosts responsible by both statute and case law, are Arizona, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, Texas and Wisconsin. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:36 am by AALRR
The Supreme Court agreed with NLRB and struck down the California law in the 2008 Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
For example, 13 states (Arkansas, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Dakota, South Carolina and South Dakota) require authorization—often by voter signature—to collect and drop off ballots on behalf of the voter. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 11:21 pm
There seems to be no question that the Bishop of South Carolina knew that there was legal coun[sel] from the PB's office. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 6:00 am by Laura Valade
Yet other jurisdictions impose civil and criminal penalties for using electronic tracking devices requiring evidence obtained in this manner without a warrant be excluded (Florida, Hawaii, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Utah). [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 9:09 am by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
(We see a similar issue in the recent Jennings case from South Carolina.) [read post]