Search for: "South Carolina v. Katzenbach" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2014, 3:32 pm by Rick Hasen
Joel Heller has a very nice piece in the California Law Review Circuit, Subsequent History Omitted, on Westlaw’s aberrant coding of the Shelby County voting rights case as having abrogated the original case upholding voting rights preclearance, South Carolina v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:18 pm by Sam Bagenstos
McClung) and the Voting Rights Act (South Carolina v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 9:04 am by Calvin Massey
  Absent proof of the kind of systematic, sub rosa discrimination that convinced the Court in South Carolina v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 8:00 pm by Dan Ernst
  He has put the shifting tally of the Iowa caucuses and Virginia's ballot access laws in historical perspective, explained how he does 21st-century history, informed us about vote denial and dilution in the South, and taken a look back at South Carolina v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 11:23 pm by Zachary Price
’”  Mangling a quote from a prior decision upholding Section 5, South Carolina v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:08 pm by Scott C. Idleman
In past Supreme Court cases, most notably Katzenbach v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
The doctrine of the equality of States, invoked by South Carolina, does not bar this approach, for that doctrine applies only to the terms upon which States are admitted to the Union, and not to the remedies for local evils which have subsequently appeared. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:26 am by Joshua Thompson
Nevertheless, when the constitutionality of Section 5 was first brought before the Court in South Carolina v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:45 am by admin
Professor Deborah Archer, an expert in civil rights law and racial discrimination law, votes for South Carolina v. [read post]