Search for: "South Carolina v. Katzenbach" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2012, 5:18 pm by Sam Bagenstos
McClung) and the Voting Rights Act (South Carolina v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 9:04 am by Calvin Massey
  Absent proof of the kind of systematic, sub rosa discrimination that convinced the Court in South Carolina v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 8:00 pm by Dan Ernst
  He has put the shifting tally of the Iowa caucuses and Virginia's ballot access laws in historical perspective, explained how he does 21st-century history, informed us about vote denial and dilution in the South, and taken a look back at South Carolina v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 11:23 pm by Zachary Price
’”  Mangling a quote from a prior decision upholding Section 5, South Carolina v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:08 pm by Scott C. Idleman
In past Supreme Court cases, most notably Katzenbach v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:26 am by Joshua Thompson
  Nevertheless, when the constitutionality of Section 5 was first brought before the Court in South Carolina v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:45 am by admin
” Professor Deborah Archer, an expert in civil rights law and racial discrimination law, votes for South Carolina v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:07 pm by Joey Fishkin
 The irony is rich: NAMUDNO itself pulled that principle out of a hat only by entirely inverting (in part through the device of a strategically placed ellipsis) the directly-on-point holding of South Carolina v. [read post]