Search for: "South Carolina v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 1,213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2010, 1:39 pm by Gregory Forman
Yesterday the United States Supreme Court accepted certiorari on the South Carolina case of Price v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:49 pm by Gregory Forman
In a highly anticipated case that generated much local notoriety, and in which some of my friends and colleagues participated, the United States Supreme Court reversed the South Carolina Supreme Court in the case of Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:39 am by immigrationprof
A federal district court has stayed the proceedings in the U.S. government's challenge to the South Carolina immigration enforcement law. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:37 am by Dan Taglioli
United States [opinion, PDF; JURIST report], US District Judge Richard Gergel held a hearing... [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:55 am by Colby Pastre
For a single filer at every level of taxable income above $70,500, South Carolina features either the highest or second-highest income tax burden in the Southeastern United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:57 am by Patrick E. Knie
Agape Senior Primary Care, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit was asked to review a case arising in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina at Columbia that presented a more unique issue. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 4:00 pm
Yesterday, a historic decision was handed down in South Carolina by United States District Court Judge Richard M. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 10:30 am by wolbrink
Although this bill does not mention Sharia law specifically, the bill is motivated by anti-Muslim animus and a manufactured fear that Sharia law is being implemented in the United States and South Carolina. [read post]
16 May 2018, 1:03 pm
The petition for review (certiorari) filed by Bishop Mark Lawrence's Diocese of South Carolina and 28 of its parishes with the Supreme Court of the United States is now ready for decision by the justices. [read post]