Search for: "South Carolina v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 1,233
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
South Carolina, 493 F.3d 404, 410–11 (4th Cir. 2007)) which held that banning possession or sale of gambling machines was not a taking. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
United States Bloomberg had a piece “Fox News Denies Defaming Playboy Model Who Claims Trump Affair”. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 12:10 pm by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
Jonathan Eggert, an attorney with Burr Forman McNair in Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, also says the Court’s decision doesn’t say the program can’t be rescinded. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 7:01 am by Gregory Forman
One might understand why in 1990 (when there wasn’t reliable paternity testing) South Carolina legislators would have wanted to place such a strong sanction on a supported spouse’s adultery–although, even then, that ban was both sexist and patriarchal, and it remains unique in United States family law. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Jamison Chung
Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
The record of medical boards and professional societies’ efforts to curb abusive medico-legal testimony is uneven.[1] In one closely followed case, the North Carolina Medical Board revoked a physician’s license on the basis of finding of “unprofessional conduct” in the form of testimony given in a medical malpractice case. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm by Robert Liles
Alabama Although not as recent as the cases currently being pursued in Texas and New Jersey, it is worth noting that a Federal case out of the Northern District of Alabama held that a healthcare provider had improperly used the after-hours billing code for weekend visits when the clinic’s normal business hours, as advertised on the clinic’s website and written to all insurance companies, were 7 days a week from 8:00 am to 6:00 pm.[10] South Carolina Th [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:00 am by FHH Law
EEO Public File Reports – All radio and television station employment units with five or more full-time employees and located in California, Illinois, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Wisconsin must place EEO Public File Reports in their OPIFs. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Considerations for Employees In the United States, employers generally are free to prospectively change an employee’s terms and conditions of employment, subject to compliance with contractual obligations and, where applicable, collective-bargaining restrictions. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:00 am by FHH Law
June 1, 2020 Radio and Television License Renewal Pre-Filing Announcements – Radio stations licensed in Illinois and Wisconsin, as well as TV stations licensed in North Carolina and South Carolina, must begin broadcasts of their pre-filing announcements concerning their applications for renewal of the license. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by Joshua Holt
His high-profile cases include the “trial of the century,” otherwise known as United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 8:23 am by Josh Blackman
South Carolina Ports Authority (2002) (same). [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 11:56 am by Nora Valenza-Frost
Where the parties to a private arbitration in the United Kingdom disagreed as to whether the arbitration panel is a “foreign or international tribunal” for purposes of obtaining testimony from residents in South Carolina pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 1:20 pm
For the US Supreme Court, the jumbled South Carolina opinions were "ambiguous" and "difficult to discern", but in the South Carolina Circuit Court, just one day later, all was suddenly "clear. [read post]