Search for: "South Carolina v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 1,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2020, 7:01 am by Gregory Forman
One might understand why in 1990 (when there wasn’t reliable paternity testing) South Carolina legislators would have wanted to place such a strong sanction on a supported spouse’s adultery–although, even then, that ban was both sexist and patriarchal, and it remains unique in United States family law. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 12:00 am
With that in mind, this year's edition made note of the following South Carolina family law appellate decisions: Prenuptial Agreements Hudson v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 12:00 am
The Stevens Firm is pleased to present the May 2015 South Carolina Family Law Update: Shearouse Advance Sheets: South Carolina Dep't of Social Services v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:26 am by suealtmeyer
In South Carolina, subversive organizations must register with the Secretary of State within thirty days after coming into existence in the State. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:08 am by Brian A. Comer
Risperdal is different from other antipsychotic medicines and “doctors needed to know that,” he added.Jurors will begin deliberating the case tomorrow.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:41 am by Andrew Frisch
South Carolina Dept. of Corrections In this case Plaintiff, an employee of the South Carolina Department of Corrections (“SCDC”), sought compensation for overtime work under Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b).  [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 5:30 am by The Stevens Firm, P.A.
The Stevens Firm is pleased to present the June 2015 South Carolina Family Law Update: Supreme Court of the United States (October Term, 2014) Slip Opinions: Ohio v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:30 am by Jenny Stevens
Yesterday, a historic decision was handed down in South Carolina by United States District Court Judge Richard M. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:59 pm by Patrick E. Knie
Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., the plaintiff was a woman who filed a product liability lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, seeking compensation from the defendants, which allegedly designed or manufactured a Yamaha VXS WaveRunner personal watercraft. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:59 pm by Patrick E. Knie
Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., the plaintiff was a woman who filed a product liability lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, seeking compensation from the defendants, which allegedly designed or manufactured a Yamaha VXS WaveRunner personal watercraft. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 4:30 am by Nick Farr
Today, we here at Abnormal Use take a brief hiatus from the realm of product liability todiscuss a recent decision from the South Carolina Supreme Court which will significantly impact insurers doing business in the state. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:53 pm by Patrick E. Knie
The insurance company filed a motion for summary judgment, which the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina at Orangeburg denied. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:53 pm by Patrick E. Knie
The insurance company filed a motion for summary judgment, which the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina at Orangeburg denied. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:45 pm by Patricia Salkin
The Supreme Court noted that the United States Supreme Court considered a similar case, Village of Belle Terre v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 7:00 am by Quimbee
One of the most important United States Supreme Court decisions on federalism and the division of governmental power, New York v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 11:38 am by Gregory Forman
In 2005, Husband closed a successful business in New York State and relocated to South Carolina to advance Wife’s career with United States Customs and Border Protection. [read post]