Search for: "South Dakota v. Dole" Results 21 - 40 of 104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2015, 10:15 am
Since the relevant part of the ACA is not a statute that offers conditional funds to state governments, but only private citizens, none of the rules laid out in conditional spending cases such as South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 8:21 am
  South Dakota v Dole held that the Congress could demand that states raise their drinking age as a condition for receiving federal highway funds. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:39 am by Steve Vladeck
North Carolina).It is definitely worth debating these issues on the merits, especially in the unique context of the Spending Clause, where, in my view, there is a fairly strong argument that (so long as the regulation survives South Dakota v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am by JB
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 2:37 pm by Frank Pasquale
The Court relied on, seemingly modified, and strengthened at least two existing elements of the test for conditional spending articulated in South Dakota v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:59 pm by David Kopel
Regarding conditional federal grants, in 1987 in South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:19 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
  In contrast, the monies are issue in South Dakota v. [read post]