Search for: "South Dakota v. Dole" Results 21 - 40 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2012, 2:37 pm by Frank Pasquale
The Court relied on, seemingly modified, and strengthened at least two existing elements of the test for conditional spending articulated in South Dakota v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:59 pm by David Kopel
Regarding conditional federal grants, in 1987 in South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:19 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
  In contrast, the monies are issue in South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:40 am by Randy Barnett
” In the key case of South Dakota v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:30 am by Jane Chong
Most famously, all fifty states make 21 the legal drinking age because in the most important pre-Sebelius conditional funding case, South Dakota v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 2:30 pm by Frank Pasquale
The Court relied on, seemingly modified, and strengthened at least two existing elements of the test for conditional spending articulated in South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:31 pm by Ilya Somin
” The Supreme Court had indicated that “coercive” conditional grants are unconstitutional as far back as the 1930s, and reiterated that point in South Dakota v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am by Marty Lederman
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 8:35 am by Evan M. Levow
Supreme Court held that Congress may, within reasonable limits, attach conditions to federal funding provided to states in South Dakota v. [read post]