Search for: "South Dakota v. Dole"
Results 41 - 60
of 73
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2010, 6:26 am
And by conditioning 100% of Medicaid funding on states either setting up insurance exchanges or greatly expanding Medicaid coverage, Congress is “coercing” the states (See South Dakota v Dole in which conditioning 5% of highway funds was deemed to be insufficiently coercive) and thereby unconstitutionally “commandeering” their legislative and executive branches (see New York v U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:26 pm
That notion was contained in a single sentence in the Court’s 1987 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:17 pm
This clarifies an aspect of South Dakota v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:37 pm
The recipient, in turn, will claim that the condition on the funds violates the limits of the Spending Clause, as enumerated in South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:16 am
That is how the challengers could so effectively argue that if the Medicaid expansion did not run afoul of South Dakota v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:05 am
If that doesn’t happen, the Medicaid case is going to be an extremely important ruling no matter who wins; probably the most important Spending Clause case since the 1930s, or at least since South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:30 am
In cases such as South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:04 pm
The problem with that is the Supreme Court’s own holding, in South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
In Fisher v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
In Troxel v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
App. 2003); Dole Food Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:13 pm
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 2:33 pm
Halderman (1981), and South Dakota v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:45 am
., v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:25 pm
Dole, but I note that South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 10:43 am
” And he quickly brought up a prior precedent (South Dakota v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:31 pm
" The Court reaffirmed this idea in South Dakota v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 8:43 am
See, e.g., South Dakota v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
(Class 46) German Federal Patent Court: Registrability of labels (Etikett) (Class 46) India Indian “Bayh Dole” and parliamentary committee hearings (Spicy IP) Israel Israel to be downgraded on Special 301 List? [read post]
