Search for: "South Dakota v. Dole" Results 81 - 100 of 100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2010, 5:36 am by Ted Frank
Given the space limitations of a newspaper op-ed page, it is perhaps understandable that the discussion does not quite persuasively distinguish the 7-2 South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 9:22 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: The Spending Clause has been interpreted to grant extremely broad discretion for Congress to offer conditional grants to the states - most recently in South Dakota v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:26 pm by Lyle Denniston
That notion was contained in a single sentence in the Court’s 1987 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:25 am by Gerard Magliocca
 Another answer, following South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:04 pm by John Culhane
The problem with that is the Supreme Court’s own holding, in South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:26 am by Randy Barnett
And by conditioning 100% of Medicaid funding on states either setting up insurance exchanges or greatly expanding Medicaid coverage, Congress is “coercing” the states (See South Dakota v Dole in which conditioning 5% of highway funds was deemed to be insufficiently coercive) and thereby unconstitutionally “commandeering” their legislative and executive branches (see New York v U.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:39 am by Steve Vladeck
North Carolina).It is definitely worth debating these issues on the merits, especially in the unique context of the Spending Clause, where, in my view, there is a fairly strong argument that (so long as the regulation survives South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:40 am by Randy Barnett
” In the key case of South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:40 am by Rick Hills
Constitution sheds very little light on decisions like South Dakota v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
(Class 46) German Federal Patent Court: Registrability of labels (Etikett) (Class 46)   India Indian “Bayh Dole” and parliamentary committee hearings (Spicy IP)   Israel Israel to be downgraded on Special 301 List? [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:31 pm
" The Court reaffirmed this idea in South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 8:21 am
  South Dakota v Dole held that the Congress could demand that states raise their drinking age as a condition for receiving federal highway funds. [read post]