Search for: "South Dakota v. Dole"
Results 81 - 100
of 100
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2011, 8:24 am
South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 5:36 am
Given the space limitations of a newspaper op-ed page, it is perhaps understandable that the discussion does not quite persuasively distinguish the 7-2 South Dakota v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:56 am
Olson, and South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 9:22 pm
Here is the abstract: The Spending Clause has been interpreted to grant extremely broad discretion for Congress to offer conditional grants to the states - most recently in South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 5:28 am
Under South Dakota v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:26 am
Under South Dakota v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:26 pm
That notion was contained in a single sentence in the Court’s 1987 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:25 am
Another answer, following South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:04 pm
The problem with that is the Supreme Court’s own holding, in South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:26 am
And by conditioning 100% of Medicaid funding on states either setting up insurance exchanges or greatly expanding Medicaid coverage, Congress is “coercing” the states (See South Dakota v Dole in which conditioning 5% of highway funds was deemed to be insufficiently coercive) and thereby unconstitutionally “commandeering” their legislative and executive branches (see New York v U.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:39 am
North Carolina).It is definitely worth debating these issues on the merits, especially in the unique context of the Spending Clause, where, in my view, there is a fairly strong argument that (so long as the regulation survives South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:40 am
” In the key case of South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:40 am
Constitution sheds very little light on decisions like South Dakota v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
(Class 46) German Federal Patent Court: Registrability of labels (Etikett) (Class 46) India Indian “Bayh Dole” and parliamentary committee hearings (Spicy IP) Israel Israel to be downgraded on Special 301 List? [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 9:49 am
" In cases such as South Dakota v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 8:41 pm
In the 1987 case of South Dakota v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 1:44 pm
Dole and New York v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:31 pm
" The Court reaffirmed this idea in South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 8:21 am
South Dakota v Dole held that the Congress could demand that states raise their drinking age as a condition for receiving federal highway funds. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 3:23 am
South Dakota v. [read post]