Search for: "South Dakota v. Nebraska"
Results 101 - 120
of 236
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2018, 4:42 pm
Whitt v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 9:03 am
That leaves the mid-America circuits -- the Fifth (Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas), Sixth (Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee), Seventh (Illinios, Indiana, and Wisconsin), and Eighth (Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota). [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Dakota, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, and Vermont permit recovery of filial consortium damages pursuant to interpretations of statutory language such as ‘pecuniary loss,’ ‘general loss,’ and ‘fair and just. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:22 pm
(I'm not taking a position on the controversial question of statehood here), Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah (submitter), Vermont, and Washington.All of the most populous states except California--which… [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:43 am
The court, however, held that the employee, at the time of the injury, was engaged in a non-agricultural activity and was covered by the Nebraska workers’ compensation statute. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
Hamil v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:13 am
In Himsel v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:30 am
Beard v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 11:17 pm
Nebraska and Pierce v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 5:45 am
South Dakota Supreme Court decision, this year’s Index also looks at how states are applying their sales taxes to remote sellers. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 1:51 pm
On Wednesday, Wisconsin filed a brief in support of Indiana; the brief was supported by the following: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, The Michigan Attorney General, and Governor Phil Bryant of the State of Mississippi. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:00 pm
But states like Missouri, South Dakota, and South Carolina are working on getting their own versions passed. [read post]
CMS Vaccine Mandate Takes Effect in 26 States as Fifth Circuit Alters Scope of Nationwide Injunction
16 Dec 2021, 2:28 pm
The states of Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming filed suit in the U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 8:12 am
Department of Health and Human Services601 East 12th Street - Room 248Kansas City, MO 64106Voice Phone (816)426-7277FAX (816)426-3686TDD (816)426-7065Region VIII - Denver (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming)Velveta Howell, Regional ManagerOffice for Civil RightsU.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:55 am
The Eighth Circuit has jurisdiction over federal courts in Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Or. 1989).South Carolina: Odom v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 6:00 am
Motorola v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 8:22 am
The sage-grouse’s inhabited range stretches over 165 million acres across 11 states including Washington, Oregon, California, Nevada, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, South Dakota, North Dakota, Kansas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, New Mexico, and Arizona.[3] Avian biology studies have shown that sage-grouse avoid areas near high structures such as wind turbines, which are possible perches for birds of prey.[4] Already more than two dozen energy projects have… [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Other states exempt anything "permitted" by the relevant regulatory body (Arkansas, Connecticut, Indiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming). [read post]
17 May 2015, 3:51 pm
In late February, the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a ruling in favor of an employer in EEOC v. [read post]
