Search for: "South Dakota v. North Carolina" Results 1 - 20 of 248
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2016, 8:08 pm by Howard Friedman
 Joining Nebraska in the lawsuit are Arkansas, Kansas, Michigan, Montana, North Dakota, Ohio, South Carolina, South Dakota and Wyoming. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:00 am by Sharon Armstrong
A few weeks ago, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in The University of South Carolina v. the University of Southern California in South Carolina’s appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”). [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:42 am
Fast forward to 1956, when North Carolina decided to deal with Brown v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 6:36 am by Kate Fort
§ 1911(a) In 2011, South Dakota DSS was granted full custody of the children. [read post]
And the few other survivors—Hawaii, New Mexico, Utah, and South Dakota—seem to make little or no use of these lawsuits. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:27 am by Erin Scharff
O’Neil concluded by addressing the state’s argument that last year’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 12:29 pm by Mary Mock
Image Source: wikipedia.com Hawaii, New Mexico, North Carolina, Mississippi, South Dakota, and Utah still have homewrecker laws on their books, although the New Mexico Court of Appeals has made it clear that courts in the state disfavor these lawsuits. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 12:29 pm by Mary Mock
Image Source: wikipedia.com Hawaii, New Mexico, North Carolina, Mississippi, South Dakota, and Utah still have homewrecker laws on their books, although the New Mexico Court of Appeals has made it clear that courts in the state disfavor these lawsuits. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 3:31 pm by Unknown
North Carolina (Indian Status; Criminal Jurisdiction) A petition for habeas corpus was filed in one case on 6/17/20:In Re Scott Louis YoungBear (Civil Rights Violations) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2020.htmlOneida Nation v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:31 pm by NARF
H.R.5822 - To extend Federal recognition to the Edisto Natchez-Kusso Tribe of South Carolina, and for other purposes. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 8:28 am by Erin Scharff
” When the Supreme Court agreed to review this case, many observers hoped that the court might use it as an opportunity to address tax jurisdiction and provide guidance to taxpayers and states, especially in the wake of last summer’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 2:46 pm by Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law
"South California" does have precedent on its side (North and South Carolina, North and South Dakota, and West Virginia). [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
Complete Auto Remains the Rule, As Modified by Wayfair The South Dakota v. [read post]