Search for: "South v. Peters" Results 1 - 20 of 506
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2018, 3:22 pm by Jon Levitan
., the Retail Industry Leaders Association will host two panels discussing South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:01 am by Bruce Boyden
In my previous post, I dissected the problematic recent Seventh Circuit copyright decision in Peters v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 12:17 pm by Lawrence Solum
Peter Byrne (Georgetown University Law Center) has posted A Fixed Rule for a Changing World: The Legacy of Lucas v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:00 am by Bruce E. Boyden
In my previous post, I dissected the problematic recent Seventh Circuit copyright decision in Peters v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 6:21 pm by Peter Moulinos
The Condominium Board at the Time Warner Center Condominiums was allowed to exercise its right of first refusal and purchase a condominium unit on behalf of a prior prospective purchaser who was unable to purchase the unit from the Seller.In The South Tower Residential Board of Managers of Time Warner Center Condo. v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 7:28 pm by GGCRBHS&M
Following an appeal in Gregware v City of New York, the Appellate Division First Department ordered that a retrial on apportionment between the defendants be held. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 8:16 pm by Lawrence Solum
Josh Gupta-Kagan (University of South Carolina School of Law) has posted Stanley v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Other actions: * Grattan v Porter – $170,000 after the defendant telephoned a school alleging sexual misconduct, Queensland. * Dr Janice Duffy v Google Inc – $100,000 following search results and hyperlinks suggesting she was a “psychic stalker”, SA. * Douglas v McLernon – $700,000 to three Perth businessmen defamed on the internet, WA. * Dodds v McDonald – a Queensland barrister’s website accused the Victorian Police… [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 6:21 pm by Peter Moulinos
The Condominium Board at the Time Warner Center Condominiums was allowed to exercise its right of first refusal and purchase a condominium unit on behalf of a prior prospective purchaser who was unable to purchase the unit from the Seller who had hired a real estate attorney.In The South Tower Residential Board of Managers of Time Warner Center Condo. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 6:00 am by Timothy Saviola, Nathan Swire
The Amphibious Rapid Deployment Brigade, which currently has 2,100 members, will eventually boast 17 V-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircrafts and 52 amphibious assault vehicles; it is charged with taking or retaking contested islands in the event of an invasion. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:48 am by Zack Bluestone
Also, on Tuesday, the Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs confirmed that oral arguments for the merits portion of the Republic of the Philippines v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 10:25 pm
In Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (No 12) [2009] NSWSC 714 Justice Gzell of the New South Wales Supreme Court refused to exonerate the former James Hardie directors and executives who contravened section 180(1) Corporations Act in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (No 11)[2009] NSWSC 287 relating to their approving the content of the Draft ASX Announcement at the February 2001 board meeting and related matters. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 1:10 pm by Pam Brannon
Virginia, by Peter Wallenstein Loving v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 7:09 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
The second one is a discussion of the case of Le Sueur v eThekwini Municipality by Warren Freedman, and the last one is a discussion of the case of Apollo Tyres v South Africa (Pty) Ltd v CCMA by Shamier Ebrahim. [read post]