Search for: "Spain v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 896
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2021, 11:04 am
., Spain, Portugal, Mexico, and the Czech Republic.[11] Another aspect of the U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 8:49 am
Washington, 2021)[Spain] [Habitual Residence] [Petition granted] [Necessary expenses against Ms. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 6:56 am
California 11 March 2015, Case No. 13–cv–04065–VC, Cotter v. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 1:00 pm
Spain, et al., Case No. 2:15-cv-00152-SMM, Document 39 filed on 8/5/2016. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:45 pm
Finally, the ECtHR recalls that the dominant position that State institutions occupy, requires them to exercise restraint in the use of criminal proceedings such as in cases to protect the reputation of the Prime Minister as a representative of the State. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
See also United Mexican States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 7:27 am
C-64/20 UH v An tAire Talmhaíochta Bia agus Mara, Éire and An tArd-Aighne concerned the role that a Member State’s court has in case this Member State fails to transpose a Directive into national law. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:31 am
Rosen’s article Katcoff V. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm
Barton: Spain gave a national registration to Matratzen for mattresses, even though it’s generic in Germany. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:25 am
SPAIN Article 13 of RDL 38/2020 states that contracts for financial services provided in Spain by UK authorised institutions will remain valid, as long as they were entered into prior to 31 December 2020. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 10:30 pm
It is based in Valencia, Spain, and is in the process of expansion in Latin America. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 7:11 pm
In Riley v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 7:10 pm
As EFF, Article19, and Privacy International stated in PIETRZAK v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
The OA articles in this listing were previously referenced on this blog as of 1 January 2021.Bronze OA:"An Analysis of the ECtHR Judgment in the Case of N.D. and N.T. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 11:21 am
In one case, Little v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 7:47 am
Japan criticized China for continuing to reject the ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 3:41 am
In UQ v Marclean Technologies SLU (C 300/19) which originated in Spain, the European Court of Justice (CJEU) assessed how the reference period of 30 or 90 days should be interpreted (i.e. how dismissals should be counted for the purposes of collective consultation requirements pursuant to the Directive). [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 11:32 am
Google is no longer seen as a hero, especially outside the United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 4:55 am
Spain Vereinigung Bildender Künstler v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 10:58 am
To this end, Article 79(2) of the GDPR states that “…proceedings may be brought before the courts of the Member State where the data subject has his or her habitual residence…. [read post]
