Search for: "Speake v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 8,080
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2023, 8:47 am
As I’ll show, United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:31 am
Halkbank relies on Schooner Exchange v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:30 pm
After all, the Supremacy Clause makes the Constitution, treaties and laws of the United States supreme over state law, and while an agency regulation can plausibly be described as a "law" of the United States, it is hard to see how the exercise of prosecutorial discretion is a kind of federal "law" that preempts state law. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:53 am
Last week, in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:50 am
United States (police improperly extended traffic stop to conduct dog sniff of car). [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:08 pm
” United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 12:41 pm
Yesterday, the United States’ lawyers filed this motion to file a surreply, making this explosive allegation: ”4. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 5:36 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 9:59 am
Department of State) has published Foreign Official Immunity After Samantar: A United States Government Perspective (Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 44, no. 5, p. 1141, November 2011). [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 10:00 am
Philippa Strum, Professor Emerita of the City University of New York and a Senior Scholar at the Woodrow Wilson Center will be speaking on Speaking Freely: Whitney v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 5:53 pm
United States must have been another disappointment for Dems and advocates who are demanding raw court packing. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 12:11 pm
United States the 5th Circuit issued a decision interpreting the Supreme Court’s decision in Sackett v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 4:26 pm
This week I had the opportunity to hear former United States Register of Copyrights Marybeth Peters speak about ongoing copyright issues in the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 12:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 9:37 am
United States, which is being argued on Jan. 17. [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 5:46 am
Science, but God v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 1:30 pm
The answer is an unqualified yes.In 1982, the Supreme Court decidedPlyler v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 10:41 am
” In simpler terms, if the parties become bound to effectuate the transaction in the United States, the transaction is a domestic one, but the transaction could also be domestic if title to the securities passes within in the United States, even if the parties became bound elsewhere. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 11:56 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm
As the case was pending discretionary review from the New Mexico Supreme Court, the United States Supreme Court issued its Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
