Search for: "Speaker, M. v. Speaker, P." Results 81 - 100 of 284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2008, 10:39 pm
Speakers include Professors Suzette M. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:24 am by OBABL Staff
Before the conference officially begins, a motivational pre-conference power session will be conducted by Attorney Evangeline M. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
Ryan, 806 P.2d 935, 941 (Colo. 1991) (likewise, as to speech on matters of purely private concern). [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 11:57 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Under T-P-M restrictions, the government can regulate speech in a content-neutral way (without regard to the message conveyed by the sign) if the regulation is narrowly-tailored and leaves the speaker ample room to communicate that message in other ways. [read post]
13 May 2022, 8:40 am by JURIST Staff
Notably, despite having a microphone and speakers at their disposal, the pro-lifers were largely drowned out by the bilingual “My body, my choice! [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 10:41 am by Eugene Volokh
National Federation of the Blind requiring fundraisers to mention certain information in their pitches was unconstitutional in part because, in that situation, "[m]andating speech that a speaker would not otherwise make necessarily alters the content of the speech. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Shannon & Wilson, Inc., 564 P.2d 1131 (Wash. 1977). [3] Story v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 3:45 am by Nate Nead
James Kilroe explains the math of token velocity as follows: Burniske definition: MV=PQ Where: M= size of the asset base, V= velocity of the asset (the number of times that an average coin changes hands every day), P= price of the digital resource being provisioned, Q= quantity of the digital resource being provisioned Using the Burniske definition, valuations typically solve for M by rearranging the… [read post]