Search for: "Spear v. Place" Results 1 - 20 of 107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2009, 8:33 pm by Paul M. Rashkind
At sentencing, the district court determined that the drug quantities attributable to Spears yielded an offense level of 38, that his criminal history justified placing him in the Guidelines’ criminal history category IV, and that the resulting advisory Guidelines sentencing range was 324 to 405 months’ imprisonment. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 1:11 pm
This case was cited in the Supreme Court in R. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:37 am
Black Brothers Co., 391 A.2d 1020 (Pa. 1978), in Tincher v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 11:44 am by Kevin Russell
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral argument in Maracich v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:00 am by Seth Leventhal
Keystone Cops (often spelled “Keystone Kops”) were fictional, humorously incompetent policemen.We recently concluded a legal malpractice lawsuit (Johnson et al. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
 The Supreme Judicial Court then went on to explain that [t]he indictments in this case set forth `the time, place and circumstances of the [defendant's] alleged perjury. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 12:28 pm by Susan Brenner
On June 8, 2011, a special agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigations (Agent Spears) and a Raleigh Police Detective (Detective Boyce) executed an arrest warrant for [Camp] at his place of business. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 5:32 am
It's not yet available on BAILII, but the decision of Mr Justice Peter Smith (Chancery Division, England and Wales) in the latest episode of JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Another v Zynga, Inc [2013] EWHC 3348 (Ch) (on which see earlier Katposts here and here) is well worth a read. [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:12 pm by jefhenninger
The drugs and cell phones were allegedly distributed to inmates who had previously placed orders through Edwin Spears. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Retromark Volume V: the last six months in trade marks1. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 12:41 am
HHJ Hacon noted that it was hard to reconcile the principles from Windsurfing Chiemsee (which covers both immediate perception and potential future perception) with Spear v Zynga, Technopol and Doublemint (where the court required immediate perception by the average consumer that the mark designates a geographical origin). [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 10:12 pm by Darren Olivier
Reliance was placed on S13 (see above) and that SABC were not going to exploit the work ie that this was a special case. [read post]