Search for: "Spears v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 354
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am by Jane Chong
At minimum, bribery covers not just the taking but the giving of a bribe, and state of mind is key. [read post]
5 May 2017, 1:23 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Carrying dangerous weapon with intent to injure Convicted by a jury, in the Circuit Court for Charles County, of second degree assault and carrying a dangerous weapon with the intent to injure, James Macauthur Spears contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his weapons conviction. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:12 am by Jordan Brunner
Lebowitz asks the court to impose the remedy that was proposed on Monday under United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 1:19 pm by Lisa Daniels
Leibowitz then proposes a method by which the defense can destroy material obtained outside of discovery, while preserving any exculpatory or Brady material, by employing the framework used in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 10:12 pm by Darren Olivier
SABC, a state owned company, contented that the decisions do not constitute administrative decisions but contractual ones under their agreement with Via. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:50 am by Quinta Jurecic
Lewis was among those legal advisors disqualified by the order: “We just stopped working on anything involved with United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark As I noted in a recent post, on June 8, 2016, the SEC, in what one commentator called “the most significant SEC cybersecurity-related action to date,” announced that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC had agreed to pay a $1 million penalty to settle charges that as a result of its alleged failure to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data, some customer information was hacked and offered for sale online. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 4:07 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In an op-ed for TribLive, student Elsa Spear weighs in on the Court’s decision in Zubik v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 10:11 am by Will R. Daugherty
In determining whether information should be removed, companies should consider the Guidance that states, “Information is not directly related to a cybersecurity threat if it is not necessary to assist others detect, prevent, or mitigate the cybersecurity threat. [read post]